![]() |
|
Sentry Cracking - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Tutorials (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Tutorials) +--- Thread: Sentry Cracking (/Thread-Sentry-Cracking) |
RE: Sentry Cracking - Cressi - 04-25-2014 (04-25-2014, 01:14 AM)Adorapuff Wrote: This is a great tutorial, but you should post some configs. There are some forums dedicated to sentry configs, but the configs there are pretty shitty. Finally a proper reply ![]() Thank you, I'll definitely look into that; as soon as I get some time on my hands to write up a couple ^^ RE: Sentry Cracking - Alan Turing - 04-26-2014 (04-24-2014, 06:46 AM)Tiny Tina Wrote: It's the most important part if you want to look half decent, which you need to provide a valid argument, which you need regardless because it's the rules. Quote:I've attacked your grammar Yeah, and that's why you lost. RE: Sentry Cracking - Mom - 04-26-2014 (04-26-2014, 02:47 PM)Kosaki Wrote: Yeah, and that's why you lost. >Gets a notification of being quoted >Checks it >Facepalms at the fact that someone is trying to make this relevant again by making it seem like a loss in only one sentence. And to say that I thought you were better than that, hue. RE: Sentry Cracking - Alan Turing - 04-26-2014 (04-26-2014, 07:29 PM)Tiny Tina Wrote: >Gets a notification of being quoted *Sigh* Silly me, I shouldn't have commented if I knew you'd throw a rebuttal like that. RE: Sentry Cracking - superMAUS - 04-27-2014 (04-26-2014, 09:25 PM)Kosaki Wrote: *Sigh* Probably the best responce anyone could think of. Leave the intelligence to people like Kosaki, you can keep your grammar. RE: Sentry Cracking - timreed - 04-27-2014 hm intresting very nice Indeed :/ ![]() ![]() ![]() hm |