+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+---- Forum: Serious Discussion (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Serious-Discussion)
+---- Thread: Homosexuality [DEBATE] (/Thread-Homosexuality-DEBATE)
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - SxTxN - 06-06-2017
Well this was an unexpected title for a thread.
Homosexuality.......
Well what can I say... Gays. Fags. Homos. Cock Ramming Fags.....
I don't mind gay people, it's just there annoying fake fucking voices.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - mothered - 06-06-2017
(06-06-2017, 03:20 PM)SxTxN Wrote: I don't mind gay people, it's just there annoying fake fucking voices.
It's amazing their voices are all somewhat similar.
A temp guy at work (years go) was as gay as could be- his walk, talk, body language, you name It. Top guy though.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - Nil - 06-06-2017
Your position: Homosexuals DO NOT deserve the privilege of having the same legal rights and societal treatment as heterosexuals
I'm just going to go through you post and question your reasoning in regard to your position.
Quote:If homosexuality is comparable to infertility, then it is a disability.I would disagree based on the fact that homosexuals have procreated. They are impotent while in a sexual, monogamous relationship, but hardly considered infertile. Even so, do all disabilities call for different legal rights and societal treatment?
Quote:If homosexuality is comparable to straight people engaging in oral sex, then it is a fetish.Not sure what calling it a fetish does to strengthen your position? Seems to do the opposite.
Quote:If homosexuality is comparable to friendships with the same gender, why do they have sex?Friends have sex.
Quote:If homosexuality is safe, why do homosexuals spread the most STDs and literally tear apart each others’ sphincters?Is not an argument against homosexuality in itself. This is a result of the unsafe practice of homosexual SEX (between males might I add). To state in such a way that homosexuality is inherently unsafe is being intellectually dishonest.
Quote:If homosexuality is a valid means of romantic bonding, why does nature disallow them reproduction?romantic bonding != reproduction
Quote:If homosexual “love” is as pure as natural love, why are gays so much more promiscuous?Is increased promiscuity justification for different legal rights and treatment?
Quote:If there is nothing inherently wrong with being a homosexual, why would an entirely homosexual society cease to exist beyond a single generation?Because it wouldn't. I stated earlier that some homosexuals have and will most likely continue to procreate in their lifetime. Sexual intercourse isn't the only means for reproduction. Procreation doesn't care about sexual preferences. Procreation can be done because of the biological duty to continue your species, homosexual or heterosexual.
Quote:The fact of the matter is that homosexuality is a byproduct of genetic errors in nature. Errors occur in nature all the time, and homosexuality is a perfect example of error. Somewhere in the brain of every homosexual a critical error has occurred. In what other situation is an error encouraged or rewarded as it is in homosexuality in today’s media? You may ask yourself how this error affects you. The answer is simple. Homosexuality, despite what you are told to believe, can be indoctrinated. Why do you think the rate of children who “turn out” gay skyrockets in the presence of gay “parents”? The push for indoctrination within recent years has been quite evident through the use of protests, pride marches, and even homosexual characters being placed within children's movies and cartoons. The ironic side of it is that heterosexual pride marches are shunned and spoken out against by the homosexual community, yet heterosexuals shouldn't be allowed to do the same to homosexuals. If that isn't an obvious sign of indoctrination then I don't know what is.
Calling it an error is up to your interpretation so it doesn't matter what other "errors" are rewarded in similar ways. Homosexuality is just as frowned upon and shunned in just about anywhere as it is "rewarded" in certain media, hardly an epidemic. Indoctrination isn't so scary when what's being indoctrinated isn't as society-crashing as most people want to believe. At least, I haven't been convinced yet.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - Nil - 06-06-2017
(06-06-2017, 08:00 PM)davinciomar Wrote: hosemexual is not different from others and i think is fine, if you must to mantain a woman and all fucking shit salary go in a girl, i prefer kill myself or be homosexual if they take more money than i prefer to be dead. xD it's a joke way to speak. anyways is nothing and it's very respected for all.
I recommend forums that cater to your native language, and English lessons in the meantime. At the very minimum, don't indulge in discussions that require you to know English beyond your current understanding.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - Pikami - 06-06-2017
I don't care.
I mean it's gross and stuff, but it does not directly effect me in any way so why should I be upset.
They are still human beings and I thing we should judge people by what they say and thing, not by their sexual life.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - Bloody Eye - 06-06-2017
Not sure why anyone would care this much, unless it affects them (was @meow sodomized in his youth?) . More women for straight men. If someone wants to dabble in fetishes, get STDs, or exercise their right to not reproduce then that's their decision. If it doesn't impact the rest of us, all the better.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - Nil - 06-06-2017
(06-06-2017, 08:23 PM)davinciomar Wrote:(06-06-2017, 08:06 PM)God Wrote:(06-06-2017, 08:00 PM)davinciomar Wrote: hosemexual is not different from others and i think is fine, if you must to mantain a woman and all fucking shit salary go in a girl, i prefer kill myself or be homosexual if they take more money than i prefer to be dead. xD it's a joke way to speak. anyways is nothing and it's very respected for all.
I recommend forums that cater to your native language, and English lessons in the meantime. At the very minimum, don't indulge in discussions that require you to know English beyond your current understanding.
I respect your opinion about my english but it doesnt matter what you think about my english. About the debate of homosexuality , in my opinion it's not the problem. The problem now is other, is the possibility of these people to marriage because in many countries are forbidden the marriage between both. In the actuality, the society accepts the homosexuality.
It's not my opinion. It's a fact your English is horrific and it makes it extremely difficult for anyone to grasp what you're saying, especially in a debate thread where effective communication is key. I wasn't meaning to be rude but rather give a bit of advice to you coming from a perspective of someone who has to try and read and understand your posts. Cheers!
And that's enough from me of being off-topic. Sorry.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - Lokes - 06-20-2017
For me, as long as people stay discret about it, I am fine I guess. But if they start to involve other people with their behaviour.. for example they start to act all "gay" "buddy-buddy" with you.. I find it pretty disturbing.
But in all honesty, I am not a big fan of it. It's not "normal" at all to be gay, atleast for me, because there is a reason there are two genders...
In the end, I might be biased tho, because I am just not like that.... x_x
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - Defeat - 06-20-2017
(06-20-2017, 12:44 PM)Lokes Wrote: For me, as long as people stay discret about it, I am fine I guess. But if they start to involve other people with their behaviour.. for example they start to act all "gay" "buddy-buddy" with you.. I find it pretty disturbing.
But in all honesty, I am not a big fan of it. It's not "normal" at all to be gay, atleast for me, because there is a reason there are two genders...
In the end, I might be biased tho, because I am just not like that.... x_x
I completely agree. I wouldn't like to see the behaviour from a straight counterpart so I should get the benefit of not seeing it from them either.
I don't care for it tbh, it does not affect me so it's a whatever thing.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - H3RR3S - 07-30-2019
I don't prefer homosexuality, especially since it never meant to be "a thing". Because we people were made to continue the life of human beings.
When God created the people, he intended that they should have sex only within a marriage between man and woman
Genesis 1:27, 28
Code:
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28 Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”Leviticus 18:22
Code:
Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.Proverbs 5:18, 19
Code:
Let your fountain be blessed, and rejoice in the wife of your youth, a lovely deer, a graceful doe. Let her breasts fill you at all times with delight; be intoxicated always in her love.I don't hate it as such when I see someone who's gay I would discriminate or flame at him. I just don't want to see them making out in public and stuff.