+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive (/Thread-Thoughts-about-the-killer-USB-drive)
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - lux - 10-26-2015
(10-26-2015, 08:12 PM)mothered Wrote: Now that we understand each other, for the sake of simplicity, It prevents It from being Identified. If It prevents It from being Identified, It prevents It from functioning. If It prevents It from functioning, It prevents It from serving It's objective. Get It?
If you don't understand this, break It down Into syllables and sound out the words slowly.
Thank you.
Do you know what happens when metal touches metal, with electricity in it? Evidently not. Go back school, you degenerate humanoid.
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - dotcppfile - 10-26-2015
(10-26-2015, 08:12 PM)mothered Wrote: You both seem quite agitated. What's with the flaming? You do realize It's against forum rules?
Particularly @Eclipse you should lead by example, you're supposed to be a representation of the forum as a whole.
Now that we understand each other, for the sake of simplicity, It prevents It from being Identified. If It prevents It from being Identified, It prevents It from functioning. If It prevents It from functioning, It prevents It from serving It's objective. Get It?
If you don't understand this, break It down Into syllables and sound out the words slowly.
Thank you.
Hahaha, it has nothing to do with it being identified, it's fucking hardware based only!!! Omg I'm crying LOOL
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - Eclipse - 10-26-2015
(10-26-2015, 08:12 PM)mothered Wrote: You both seem quite agitated. What's with the flaming? You do realize It's against forum rules?
Particularly @Eclipse you should lead by example, you're supposed to be a representation of the forum as a whole.
Now that we understand each other, for the sake of simplicity, It prevents It from being Identified. If It prevents It from being Identified, It prevents It from functioning. If It prevents It from functioning, It prevents It from serving It's objective. Get It?
If you don't understand this, break It down Into syllables and sound out the words slowly.
Thank you.
I'm legit laughing out loud.
I would try and explain it to you again, but I think @lux put it best:
(10-26-2015, 08:25 PM)Lux Wrote: Do you know what happens when metal touches metal, with electricity in it? Evidently not. Go back school, you degenerate humanoid.
You lobotomised shitlark.
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - mothered - 10-26-2015
(10-26-2015, 08:25 PM)Lux Wrote: Do you know what happens when metal touches metal, with electricity in it? Evidently not. Go back school, you degenerate humanoid.
Again, flaming. Non-compliance with forum rules Is not allowed. Please read the rules to familiarize yourself, thus prevent future happenings of this nature.
I reiterate: It prevents It from being Identified. If It prevents It from being Identified, It prevents It from functioning. If It prevents It from functioning, It prevents It from serving It's objective. Hence It's objective In a non-functional manner Is futile.
(10-26-2015, 08:31 PM)dotcppfile Wrote: Hahaha, it has nothing to do with it being identified, it's fucking hardware based only!!! Omg I'm crying LOOLAs for you, well, you're simply not worthy of a reply. Due to your Incapacity to comprehend the most simplistic of things, It falls on deaf ears.
(10-26-2015, 08:50 PM)Eclipse Wrote: I'm legit laughing out loud.
I would try and explain it to you again, but I think @lux put it best:
That's fine pertaining to a reply. As per our previous discussions, I don't expect anything from you that'll warrant a constructive response.
Apart from the flaming thanks fellas for your entertainment. You've made my day.
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - Eclipse - 10-26-2015
(10-26-2015, 09:20 PM)mothered Wrote: Again, flaming. Non-compliance with forum rules Is not allowed. Please read the rules to familiarize yourself, thus prevent future happenings of this nature.
I reiterate: It prevents It from being Identified. If It prevents It from being Identified, It prevents It from functioning. If It prevents It from functioning, It prevents It from serving It's objective. Hence It's objective In a non-functional manner Is futile.
As for you, well, you're simply not worthy of a reply. Due to your Incapacity to comprehend the most simplistic of things, It falls on deaf ears.
That's fine pertaining to a reply. As per our previous discussions, I don't expect anything from you that'll warrant a constructive response.
Apart from the flaming thanks fellas for your entertainment. You've made my day.
Na mate. Thank you for the entertainment. Your idiocy is astounding.
Spoiler:
Also the fact that your only defence to being rekt is to quote the forum rules. Legit you should ask your parents if you were drop kicked as a kid. I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and still shit out less retarded posts than yours.
Spoiler:
All right, since we couldn't explain it to you, let me just clarify a fact. You're wrong. Whether or not you choose to accept that fact is your decision. This USB does not work on the software level at all. Whether or not the computer recognises it or installs it or blocks it or whatever the fuck it's doing is none of the electrons and capacitors and energy's concern. You might as well deploy the same defences for a guy with an axe standing over your PC. Stop embarrassing yourself.
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - dotcppfile - 10-26-2015
(10-26-2015, 09:20 PM)mothered Wrote: Again, flaming. Non-compliance with forum rules Is not allowed. Please read the rules to familiarize yourself, thus prevent future happenings of this nature.
I reiterate: It prevents It from being Identified. If It prevents It from being Identified, It prevents It from functioning. If It prevents It from functioning, It prevents It from serving It's objective. Hence It's objective In a non-functional manner Is futile.
As for you, well, you're simply not worthy of a reply. Due to your Incapacity to comprehend the most simplistic of things, It falls on deaf ears.
That's fine pertaining to a reply. As per our previous discussions, I don't expect anything from you that'll warrant a constructive response.
Apart from the flaming thanks fellas for your entertainment. You've made my day.
We made your day? mate, you made our year, haha, you seriously can't admit you're wrong can you? Do you have any idea what is USB Killer or how does it work? You clearly don't, even though it was explained multiple times in this thread, yet you mentioned GPOs which has nothing to do with it and called whoever replied to you "amusing" when they were trying to help you learn something you pathetic cunt lol.
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - Skull-Cruncher - 11-07-2015
How would this be useful in anyway lmao.
Besides for killing peoples computer, but how many people would you actually do that too.
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - 0xide - 11-07-2015
(11-07-2015, 04:23 AM)Skull-Cruncher Wrote: How would this be useful in anyway lmao.It's handy if you're being raided and want a quick system wipe.
Besides for killing peoples computer, but how many people would you actually do that too.
RE: Thoughts about the killer USB-drive - NzFrog - 11-10-2015
I personally do not think this works for many reasons, but in saying that if it did that would be epic.