Sinisterly
fagcommunity.rocks - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: fagcommunity.rocks (/Thread-fagcommunity-rocks)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - Blunt - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:03 PM)MikeM Wrote: Great job on using wikipedia which clearly shows how retarded you are.

Seriously wikipedia is one of the most untrusted sources you can take out.
I am talking out of experience, wikipedia is talking about people that can and do change shit to their own needs.

I'd +1 you, but my rep has been disabled for being a G Tongue hahahah


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - dopamine - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:05 PM)The Toilet Paper King Wrote: you fucking fools. scripting languages are programming languages, but programming languages are not necessarily scripting languages.

i think you're all a bunch of fucking noobs. none of you cunts know what you're talking about.

Because this:
Quote:Python, Perl, PHP all are executed by their interpreter thats why they're not programming languages. A programming language is whose code you compile with a compiler and translate to byte code(Java, C# etc) or machine code (C, C++, Pascal etc).

is not correct, right? Smile

(11-30-2014, 06:05 PM)Blunts Wrote: I'd +1 you, but my rep has been disabled for being a G Tongue hahahah

You still haven't posted any code faggot. Don't even try to post shitty scripts.


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - The Toilet Paper King - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:08 PM)dopamine Wrote: Because this:

is not correct, right? Smile

Of course its not correct. thats just a fucking stupid/limited definition of a programming language.


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - MikeM - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:08 PM)dopamine Wrote: Because this:

is not correct, right? Smile

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17253545/scripting-language-vs-programming-language
"Scripting languages are programming languages that don't require an explicit compilation step."

even if it doesn't require a compiler it's still is a programming language.

Just read further and rather don't go on about that topic. You won't win anyways.


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - Kizaru - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:03 PM)MikeM Wrote: Great job on using wikipedia which clearly shows how retarded you are.

Seriously wikipedia is one of the most untrusted sources you can take out.
I am talking out of experience, wikipedia is talking about people that can and do change shit to their own needs.

Just go and hang yourself with a vga-cable already.


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - Blunt - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:09 PM)The Toilet Paper King Wrote: Of course its not correct. thats just a fucking stupid/limited definition of a programming language.



RE: fagcommunity.rocks - MikeM - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:10 PM)Yagmi Wrote: Just go and hang yourself with a vga-cable already.

Don't like that we are bashing your fuck buddy over there?

Seriously your friend is building up retarded replies...


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - Kizaru - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:12 PM)MikeM Wrote: Don't like that we are bashing your fuck buddy over there?

Seriously your friend is building up retarded replies...

I don't even know him dude.


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - dopamine - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:12 PM)MikeM Wrote: Don't like that we are bashing your fuck buddy over there?

Seriously your friend is building up retarded replies...

I don't know anyone on this forum faggot.


RE: fagcommunity.rocks - MikeM - 11-30-2014

(11-30-2014, 06:12 PM)Yagmi Wrote: I don't even know him dude.

Then why are you even supporting his retarded comments like a programming language have to be with a compiler?

hmmm......

read his posts and think twice before posting something stupid.