+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: Life (/Thread-Life--49854)
RE: Life - chmod - 05-26-2013
Fair enough, my point was that the op has shown no interest in getting involved with the actual subject of the community (thus why I have left it so long before bringing it up) , and the delicate subject he/she brought up. If the staff are happy I'm happy
RE: Life - Linuxephus™ - 05-26-2013
(05-26-2013, 03:49 AM)chmod Wrote: Fair enough, my point was that the op has shown no interest in getting involved with the actual subject of the community (thus why I have left it so long before bringing it up) , and the delicate subject he/she brought up. If the staff are happy I'm happy
We are trying to take a more "open" view on subject matters without wielding the All Mighty BanHammer and BootsToAsses Protocol blindly. When needed, as needed, absolutely. This however is not a case as such.
Rest assured, I've personally read every statement, and in each of the statements I find no merit in the context of those words issued forth by the Author to indicate an intentional Spamming per say, or we'd be having the conversation where, "Yes, said Author was Revoked for Spamming intentionally inflammatory material."
I understood your initial concerns, which is why I triple checked the reading I have already done pertaining to your comments previously as I always do.
I believe the Author merely uses the thread to accustom himself to the Community while asking a genuine question in lieu of "getting to know all of us".
And if the Author decides to stay locked away here in the Open Section, so is his right to do so as long as he feels the necessity to.
As it stands, in this thread at least, the Author has benefited the Community with intellectual conversation, and now will be bidden to peruse other parts of the Community at his own convenience.
I even went so far as to to double check the thread I authored in Announcements some few days back and thus far, all criteria are met as originally authored by Deque and Anima Templi.
RE: Life - Nailo - 05-26-2013
"And What About the Brain that you Think Using it ,and not like all the other Creatures,By Chance too!.."
Argument from Ignorance
Exclusion (ganglia and primitive brains are ignored)
Evolution.The nervous systems of insects and flatworms do not contain brains, but contain clusters of neurons called ganglia that control their movements and behavior. While it is true that ganglia are very different from simple nervous systems, it does not take a complex set of neurons to produce a beneficial behavior. Ganglia could be the result of many such additions of reflexes. It is a fine line to cross between clusters of ganglia and primitive brains such as those found in reptiles, which could later have evolved into the complex brains we see today. Brains could be complex precisely because they have evolved over a long period of time.
RE: Life - Keepalive - 05-26-2013
Linuxephus™ There's No Words Better Than Your's
I don't have Anymore to replay those Who inculpation me,and have been so defensive,for their Ideas (when they don't have a real Proof)
and Not open to Something Might be True.
Thank you.
(05-26-2013, 05:05 AM)LiveFaster Wrote: "And What About the Brain that you Think Using it ,and not like all the other Creatures,By Chance too!.."
Argument from Ignorance
Exclusion (ganglia and primitive brains are ignored)
Evolution.The nervous systems of insects and flatworms do not contain brains, but contain clusters of neurons called ganglia that control their movements and behavior. While it is true that ganglia are very different from simple nervous systems, it does not take a complex set of neurons to produce a beneficial behavior. Ganglia could be the result of many such additions of reflexes. It is a fine line to cross between clusters of ganglia and primitive brains such as those found in reptiles, which could later have evolved into the complex brains we see today. Brains could be complex precisely because they have evolved over a long period of time.
your answer Based on the Unmanaged Evolution theory,(which you don't have Proof of it)
RE: Life - FunKx - 05-26-2013
@Keepalive
Lol. Why did you make this thread anyway? Seems like you just don't care about this thread, then what's the point of making it...
Pluss...you want some kind of proof...but you know that, regardless of theory, noone can prove anything.
That sorted out...I guess you just made this thread for fun, to fck with people.
No point in this. I suggest, close the thread and ban the clown. Or just close the thread, and I'll fck that clown in the ass.
RE: Life - Linuxephus™ - 05-26-2013
(05-26-2013, 12:28 PM)FunKx Wrote: @Keepalive
Lol. Why did you make this thread anyway? Seems like you just don't care about this thread, then what's the point of making it...
Pluss...you want some kind of proof...but you know that, regardless of theory, noone can prove anything.
That sorted out...I guess you just made this thread for fun, to fck with people.
No point in this. I suggest, close the thread and ban the clown. Or just close the thread, and I'll fck that clown in the ass.
The quick side noted conversation betwixt I and Chmod wasn't a figurative license to infer it's Open Season On All Suckheads good sir.
It was specifically crafted to lead to the conclusion stated above in my closing conversation with Chmod in the public domain.
Based upon your quite amusing emotional outburst to the contrary, it is evident your statement is intentionally designed to draw a reaction from the Author to get the thread material closed because you have decided to take offence to the fact of what history and even scientists acknowledge, notwithstanding each school of thought of using a differing means to explain what they understand in their own terminology.
Now you and I both know better than that, and your very statement is undeniable acknowledgement of that.
Behave, or go stand in the corner.
In either case, were another Member trashing you with the same words, then they would be addressed the same. You see, it is not the thread material that is offensive, other than an individual intentionally attempting to turn it offensive.
You know better than that.
As do I.
As do we All.
Note for the record: Now you The Reader know what I meant with the statement "I have my own dissertation forthcoming in due time".
And alas, so it is written accordingly.
RE: Life - Nailo - 05-26-2013
"your answer Based on the Unmanaged Evolution theory,(which you don't have Prove of it) "
I have 2 questions for you , Do you accept evolution or not? how about abiogenesis ? i want make a rebuttal but i don't wanna waste time if you don't even hold acceptance to the most "legit" theory's as how life came to be in this planet.
RE: Life - Keepalive - 05-27-2013
(05-26-2013, 08:17 PM)LiveFaster Wrote: "your answer Based on the Unmanaged Evolution theory,(which you don't have Prove of it) "
I have 2 questions for you , Do you accept evolution or not? how about abiogenesis ? i want make a rebuttal but i don't wanna waste time if you don't even hold acceptance to the most "legit" theory's as how life came to be in this planet.
First We was talked about The Unmanaged Evolution Theory..
and I Think It's Obvious ,that i don't Believe in it(Who made the first element,I think It's Impossible to be this Complicated Process had done without Managing,..
Monkeys For Example,They Have Brain and Have Some intelligence,Even So Did THey Created Anything Over the Years?
How You Can Believe,That Blind Evolution Has Done The living Cell ,That Has Created The DNA?!
About "Abiogenesis" I think that Louis Pasteur& Francesco Redi ً Was Confuted This Theory.. So I don't Need to Talk About It.
RE: Life - SPG.WoLF_TSC - 05-27-2013
I personally don't believe in God, but i respect everyone who does. My father believes in Him, and i had to go with my father to the church sometimes, which (for me, no offense) was time waste. Everyone will come to his end, and will see what happens after death.
RE: Life - Keepalive - 05-27-2013
(05-27-2013, 01:49 PM)SPG.WoLF_TSC Wrote: I personally don't believe in God, but i respect everyone who does. My father believes in Him, and i had to go with my father to the church sometimes, which (for me, no offense) was time waste. Everyone will come to his end, and will see what happens after death.
Good,
First I respect your Choice.
Yes,We Will all Die,and See What Will happened after Death,But It Will be Too late To do Anything.
In My Opinion,Believing in The Idea of God existence,Is A thing..
And having A Religion is Another..
Such As, In the Age Of the Messenger "Ibrahim" They Were ,Worships the Sun,and moon,.... But He's Logic Denied That,but Didn't deny The Idea that there Is A God Created The World And Created Him.. So he started Looking For The Real God..
Maybe ,You Think The devotion for God Is a Time Waste Because You are not convinced in The Christianity ,And As I was Said It Was interpolated.. But There's Another Religion ,Might Convince you Don't you Think?
I Wondering ,And I don't Know Why People When They Try To think In this Thing's and Find No Answer ,They Quickly abandon Seeking Answers..
Even, Since we are mortals, It's The Most Important Matter,Not In my Opinion But in The logic,Cause Your All Being linked to this Matter.
Maybe , Because they liked to Have Excuse,to have no commitment to the responsibilities That God Wanna Us To (Do/Not to Do)
Yes,God didn't Show us Him Self by our Eyes,But he gave us the Brain to See Him Using It.