+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.ly/Forum-World-News)
+--- Thread: Child Pornography (/Thread-Child-Pornography)
RE: Child Pornography - Equinox - 03-03-2014
(03-03-2014, 05:22 AM)coffeeupbeat Wrote: Also am sure many members including me wouldn't mind check the video out if you still had the link
I really have not seen these media entities and do not want to.
RE: Child Pornography - Anizeb - 03-03-2014
Nudity =/= Pornography, but still:
Nudity is not bad.
Pornography is not bad.
Sexuality is not bad.
They're exploring their sexuality in the digital age. Really, this isn't a lot different then reading a Playboy.
And they definitely shouldn't be punished, they should be educated on the potential negative effects(perhaps in a weekend class, has a twofold effect that way).
The US, (especially Texas, sorry Duubzy, you knows it's true) is already fucking stupid enough. Shit like that isn't helping.
RE: Child Pornography - SpermaHaren - 03-03-2014
Completely retarded, i blame the parents 100%. How can you NOT have even the slightest control over your kid, its your job to make them a good human being.
RE: Child Pornography - misnar - 03-03-2014
You guys act like only boys want sex. If you were a horny teenager like they were, and whoever you were attracted to wanted to see you nude, would you let them see? If you say no you were either an asexual or lying.
RE: Child Pornography - Satan - 03-03-2014
(03-03-2014, 09:25 AM)Anizeb Wrote: Nudity =/= Pornography
While that's true to an extent, this is the definition of Pornography:
Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.
I really doubt that these girls are doing this for aesthetic or emotional feelings.
There is a difference between reading Playboy, and sharing explicit pictures of 11 year olds.
While I agree exploring your sexuality isn't bad, its only good if you're exploring it in an environment where you aren't going to be damaged, your reputation won't be damaged, etc.
& Sexual education needs to be made earlier, I agree, but it needs to have an early focus on the negative effects of it.
RE: Child Pornography - w00t - 03-03-2014
(03-03-2014, 06:26 PM)Satan Wrote: Sexual education needs to be made earlier, I agree, but it needs to have an early focus on the negative effects of it.
No. Sex is not a bad thing, and it shouldn't be taught as such. Sex ed should be all about safe sex. Leave it to social sciences to teach the social implications.
RE: Child Pornography - Satan - 03-03-2014
(03-03-2014, 07:50 PM)w00t Wrote: No. Sex is not a bad thing, and it shouldn't be taught as such. Sex ed should be all about safe sex. Leave it to social sciences to teach the social implications.
Negative effects, not that sex is bad and you should feel bad, mkay?
E.g. Early teenage pregnancy, STDs, etc, all which even with practicing safe sex, can happen.
RE: Child Pornography - Sined - 03-03-2014
(02-28-2014, 08:42 PM)Duubz Wrote: At Liberty Junoir High, located in Dallas, Tx, female children have been spreading pictures of themselves in the nude. They have received out of school suspension and other possible punishments from their parents.
Yes, this is the school I go to. No, I do not have these images nor do I want them.;
I wouldn't call children looking at other children 'child pornography'
RE: Child Pornography - Satan - 03-04-2014
(03-03-2014, 10:20 PM)Sined Wrote: I wouldn't call children looking at other children 'child pornography'
Perhaps you wouldn't, but some jurisdictions would.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexting#Legal_issues
RE: Child Pornography - Sined - 03-04-2014
(03-04-2014, 05:24 AM)Satan Wrote: Perhaps you wouldn't, but some jurisdictions would.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexting#Legal_issues
I suppose, however it's just my personal opinion.