![]() |
|
Firefox Quantum - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General) +--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.ly/Forum-World-News) +--- Thread: Firefox Quantum (/Thread-Firefox-Quantum--92788) |
RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017 (11-15-2017, 11:50 PM)dockarxg910 Wrote: I used to like chrome, but didn't have the features I liked so I switched to firefox. It then became too buggy for me with the constant crashes and the sync account needs to be updated every time I open the browser which got really annoying. Not sure if it's going to get any better but I did like firefox for a time. Now using Vivaldi and it's a pretty nice browser. I didn't have that problem never had with Firefox and about sync account, I used to update it while using CCleaner on Full browsers scan. RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017 (11-16-2017, 12:37 AM)Synthx Wrote: I'm still using the Nightly version, I actually don't know why I'm not using the main version. It's definitely faster for me! The main version got the Quantum update which was a Beta version before. RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017 (11-16-2017, 02:11 AM)FreightTrain Wrote: I noticed the new browser is definitely faster than the previous FF, even with some of the settings I changed to speed it up. I've never been a big fan of chrome so FF has always been my go-to. My only complaint is the updated Adblock Plus. It's not as user-friendly as before. Looks like they spent all of their time trying to make it look pretty, but killed a lot of the functionality the previous version had. It takes like 6 clicks to block a single image now and I need to get the image url beforehand to add it. You used to just right click the image and select block and that was it. Idk, maybe I'm just doing it wrong. The browser itself I have no complains on though. Actually yeah the old extensions can't use them on Quantum version. I don't use Ad Block, I'm using uBlock Origin and it had a new update for Quantum Version. Some of extensions don't have update so Quantum has a future to find similar extensions for you. RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017 (11-16-2017, 11:14 AM)Bish0pQ Wrote:(11-16-2017, 11:12 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote: My Google Chrome used 2.8 GB for just one tab on FaceBook. Yeah I think, it stopped my computer from working .I didn't believe when I saw it. RE: Firefox Quantum - Bish0pQ - 11-16-2017 @Mr.Kurd Even internet explorer would be better in that case lol. Firefox has always been better in terms of "low-end" systems in my opinion. RE: Firefox Quantum - Synthx - 11-16-2017 (11-16-2017, 11:16 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote:(11-16-2017, 12:37 AM)Synthx Wrote: I'm still using the Nightly version, I actually don't know why I'm not using the main version. It's definitely faster for me! Yeah, I know... I have the nightly version of Quantum. RE: Firefox Quantum - FreightTrain - 11-16-2017 (11-16-2017, 11:38 AM)Bish0pQ Wrote: @Mr.Kurd Even internet explorer would be better in that case lol. Firefox has always been better in terms of "low-end" systems in my opinion. What do you consider low-end and what do you consider better then? I've just always used FF and I like a few of the addons so I've just stuck with it. I'm definitely open to something that might be better though. |