Bring back MotM (again) - Printable Version

Bring back MotM (again) - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: Announcements (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Announcements)
+---- Forum: Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Suggestions)
+----- Forum: Old Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Old-Suggestions)
+----- Thread: Bring back MotM (again) (/Thread-Bring-back-MotM-again)

Pages: 1 2 3 4

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - Double06 - 05-04-2017

(05-04-2017, 01:37 PM)LordBos_X Wrote: This sounds like a good idea. Who decides the winner if more than one person is nominated?

Usually (like other trends with MotM) there is a voting poll with the nominees. Most member voted on wins the award.

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - zenith - 05-04-2017

An argument against it is that it just becomes a popularity contest / being a nice person makes you a great member, and that's not what it's really about.

I'm personally for it. It gives users a reason to be HQ.

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - pvnk - 05-08-2017

(05-04-2017, 02:16 PM)Zenith Wrote: An argument against it is that it just becomes a popularity contest / being a nice person makes you a great member, and that's not what it's really about.

I'm personally for it. It gives users a reason to be HQ.

What about members like me who are HQ without any reason?

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - insidious - 05-08-2017

It's got my vote! Lets see where this goes this time

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - pvnk - 05-08-2017

(05-08-2017, 04:53 PM)insidious Wrote: It's got my vote! Lets see where this goes this time

Probably nowhere because managing motm seems like it would take too much commitment for this community and no, I'm not kidding.

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - Double06 - 05-08-2017

(05-08-2017, 04:54 PM)pvnk Wrote:
(05-08-2017, 04:53 PM)insidious Wrote: It's got my vote! Lets see where this goes this time
Probably nowhere because managing motm seems like it would take too much commitment for this community and no, I'm not kidding.

Wouldn't say it takes so much commitment to host the contest, it's really member-driven.

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - Skullmeat - 05-08-2017

If we did MotM we would have to set some rules. I personally would disqualify members with bans in the past 3 months.

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - zenith - 05-08-2017

(05-08-2017, 04:18 PM)pvnk Wrote:
(05-04-2017, 02:16 PM)Zenith Wrote: An argument against it is that it just becomes a popularity contest / being a nice person makes you a great member, and that's not what it's really about.

I'm personally for it. It gives users a reason to be HQ.
What about members like me who are HQ without any reason?

It's an extra award for being HQ lul

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - pvnk - 05-08-2017

(05-08-2017, 06:24 PM)Zenith Wrote:
(05-08-2017, 04:18 PM)pvnk Wrote:
(05-04-2017, 02:16 PM)Zenith Wrote: An argument against it is that it just becomes a popularity contest / being a nice person makes you a great member, and that's not what it's really about.

I'm personally for it. It gives users a reason to be HQ.
What about members like me who are HQ without any reason?

It's an extra award for being HQ lul

Awww you guys are too kind.

RE: Bring back MotM (again) - Blink - 05-08-2017

(05-08-2017, 05:39 PM)Skullmeat Wrote: If we did MotM we would have to set some rules. I personally would disqualify members with bans in the past 3 months.

I agree with the above post.

Spoiler:

@pvnk might end up getting it if not for this