+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+---- Forum: Serious Discussion (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Serious-Discussion)
+---- Thread: Old Debate, Change of Heart? (/Thread-Old-Debate-Change-of-Heart)
RE: Old Debate, Change of Heart? - Jiggly - 06-16-2016
(06-16-2016, 06:59 PM)Eclipse Wrote: That chart is completely invalid without definitions if it uses the legal definition of violent crime. UK legislation classes 'violent crimes' under the most idiotic, harmless things.
Nothing will ever protect the fact someone can target a group of people and strip them from their right to live
Again, the chart was simply there to visually show what I was saying. It's not about the chart or it's accuracy. I would have drawn a diagram myself if I'd known people would get so obsessed over it xD
RE: Old Debate, Change of Heart? - Eclipse - 06-16-2016
(06-16-2016, 08:00 PM)Jiggly Wrote:(06-16-2016, 06:59 PM)Eclipse Wrote: That chart is completely invalid without definitions if it uses the legal definition of violent crime. UK legislation classes 'violent crimes' under the most idiotic, harmless things.
Nothing will ever protect the fact someone can target a group of people and strip them from their right to live
Again, the chart was simply there to visually show what I was saying. It's not about the chart or it's accuracy. I would have drawn a diagram myself if I'd known people would get so obsessed over it xD
You used the chart to back up your point of view. If "it's not about the chart or its accuracy", you should remove it from the OP instead of relying on Britain First quotes and bullshit.
RE: Old Debate, Change of Heart? - Jiggly - 06-16-2016
(06-16-2016, 09:00 PM)Eclipse Wrote:(06-16-2016, 08:00 PM)Jiggly Wrote:(06-16-2016, 06:59 PM)Eclipse Wrote: That chart is completely invalid without definitions if it uses the legal definition of violent crime. UK legislation classes 'violent crimes' under the most idiotic, harmless things.
Nothing will ever protect the fact someone can target a group of people and strip them from their right to live
Again, the chart was simply there to visually show what I was saying. It's not about the chart or it's accuracy. I would have drawn a diagram myself if I'd known people would get so obsessed over it xD
You used the chart to back up your point of view. If "it's not about the chart or its accuracy", you should remove it from the OP instead of relying on Britain First quotes and bullshit.
Alright, I'll remove it. And no, it was added for the reason I explained. This thread isn't about a chart, it's about the topic of guns, access to defensive or offensive items and what people think they best solution is in their opinion.
Chart removed.
RE: Old Debate, Change of Heart? - Eclipse - 06-17-2016
@Jiggly, were you the Britain First supported to shot and murdered Jo Cox, being all pro-gun?
There's more gun shops than Starbucks, McDonald's, and grocery stores combined in America. That says something.
![[Image: 10727-1leqxv5.jpg]](http://indy100.independent.co.uk/image/10727-1leqxv5.jpg)
RE: Old Debate, Change of Heart? - Jiggly - 06-17-2016
(06-17-2016, 09:13 AM)Eclipse Wrote: @Jiggly, were you the Britain First supported to shot and murdered Jo Cox, being all pro-gun?
I'm not all pro gun. I'm pro making crime lower and making people less likely to die. Jo Cox was an incredible woman and I have a lot of respect for her. Also, I do not understand what you just said, unless I have misread, it doesn't make sense?
(06-17-2016, 09:13 AM)Eclipse Wrote: There's more gun shops than Starbucks, McDonald's, and grocery stores combined in America. That says something.
And that is actually ridiculous. O.o