![]() |
|
Child Pornography - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General) +--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.ly/Forum-World-News) +--- Thread: Child Pornography (/Thread-Child-Pornography) |
RE: Child Pornography - BlueScreen - 03-01-2014 I personally feel as if she posted the pictures and spread them around herself, which from reading the OP yesterday seemed to be the case, thats okay. If she wants to be looked at as a slut, or want little pre pubecent boys to look at her pictures and masturbate, then share them to all their little friends so they can do the same, that's HER CHOICE. However, if, as most of these cases go, she sent it to one person, I think that person should be punished with a minimum of 10 weeks in community service and a $1000 fine. RE: Child Pornography - Satan - 03-01-2014 (03-01-2014, 05:14 AM)BlueScreen Wrote: If she wants to be looked at as a slut, or want little pre pubecent boys to look at her pictures and masturbate, then share them to all their little friends so they can do the same, that's HER CHOICE. So you're saying a 12 year old is mature enough to not only make a choice, but understand and accept the ramifications of that choice? In that case, why not declare 12 year olds adults, since they have the maturity to make their own decisions, since parents would be a moot point then. RE: Child Pornography - Jolly - 03-01-2014 (03-01-2014, 05:14 AM)BlueScreen Wrote: I personally feel as if she posted the pictures and spread them around herself, which from reading the OP yesterday seemed to be the case, thats okay. If she wants to be looked at as a slut, or want little pre pubecent boys to look at her pictures and masturbate, then share them to all their little friends so they can do the same, that's HER CHOICE. Why should a person be punished for something that another person sent to him unwillingly? RE: Child Pornography - Eclipse - 03-01-2014 (03-01-2014, 09:05 AM)Jolly Wrote: Why should a person be punished for something that another person sent to him unwillingly? Because he would've betrayed the trust of her and shared it, as is the case everywhere. This is a major problem, commonly named, 'underage sexting'. RE: Child Pornography - Jolly - 03-01-2014 (03-01-2014, 09:15 AM)Aurora Wrote: Because he would've betrayed the trust of her and shared it, as is the case everywhere. This is a major problem, commonly named, 'underage sexting'. I don't think it's proper to punish someone based on what the majority might do... RE: Child Pornography - Equinox - 03-01-2014 (03-01-2014, 10:27 PM)Jolly Wrote: I don't think it's proper to jail someone based on what the majority might do... Nobody said anything about jail. RE: Child Pornography - Jolly - 03-01-2014 (03-01-2014, 10:36 PM)Duubz Wrote: Nobody said anything about jail. My mistake, bad wording. RE: Child Pornography - coffeeupbeat - 03-03-2014 (02-28-2014, 09:39 PM)BreShiE Wrote: This was the norm for my area. I remember being about 13-14 when this really hot teen from the school next to ours released a porn video of herself (she was only 15). Was hot as fuck, gave me a boner straight away. Clean, shaven, petite and skinny. A horny 14 year olds dream. Interesting story. curious to know if she did it for financial gain or just for the heck Looks like these chics know how to self e-whore Also am sure many members including me wouldn't mind check the video out if you still had the link
RE: Child Pornography - infiniteMax - 03-03-2014 That's fucking disgusting, who would accept these pictures anyways? Even at those ages I wasn't interested the bodies of girls in my age group. Just nasty. RE: Child Pornography - Satan - 03-03-2014 (03-03-2014, 05:22 AM)coffeeupbeat Wrote: Also am sure many members including me wouldn't mind check the video out if you still had the link That's just wrong. |