Sinisterly
SSH to CMD on Windows - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Computers (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Computers)
+--- Forum: Operating Systems (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Operating-Systems)
+--- Thread: SSH to CMD on Windows (/Thread-SSH-to-CMD-on-Windows)

Pages: 1 2


RE: SHH to CMD on Windows - Oni - 03-29-2018

Used Cygwin a couple years ago. If I need to, I just dual-boot Debian.


RE: SHH to CMD on Windows - Blink - 03-29-2018

(03-28-2018, 11:15 PM)Pikami Wrote:
(03-28-2018, 10:17 PM)Ender Wrote:
(03-28-2018, 09:58 PM)Pikami Wrote: I'm forced to use Windows so you know Biggrin

cough Windows PE in a VM cough

Yeah, have fun compiling thousands of lines of code in a VM

That's why I said Windows PE instead of plain Windows, much less overhead.
Why would you code for Windows though...


RE: SHH to CMD on Windows - Pikami - 03-29-2018

(03-29-2018, 02:27 AM)Ender Wrote:
(03-28-2018, 11:15 PM)Pikami Wrote:
(03-28-2018, 10:17 PM)Ender Wrote: cough Windows PE in a VM cough

Yeah, have fun compiling thousands of lines of code in a VM

That's why I said Windows PE instead of plain Windows, much less overhead.
Why would you code for Windows though...

Because university


RE: SHH to CMD on Windows - mothered - 03-29-2018

(03-29-2018, 02:27 AM)Ender Wrote: That's why I said Windows PE instead of plain Windows, much less overhead.

Significantly less overhead.

I still have the WinPE bootable ISO created a number of years ago.


RE: SHH to CMD on Windows - Bish0pQ - 03-29-2018

On Windows I have always used Putty. It's simple, exists for a long time and does what it needs to do. Have used CygWin before but preferred Putty.


RE: SHH to CMD on Windows - Pikami - 03-29-2018

(03-29-2018, 05:24 PM)Bish0pQ Wrote: On Windows I have always used Putty. It's simple, exists for a long time and does what it needs to do. Have used CygWin before but preferred Putty.

I used putty when I didn't know that CygWin existed, now I can't use putty because for me CygWin is so much better imo.
I don't like the Right-click to paste function on putty and there are other annoying things that make user experience horrible.
Nevertheless putty is a functional tool that works and it's a standalone executable that has a GUI for connections/settings and stuff witch makes it easy to use so I see how some people would prefer to use it.


RE: SHH to CMD on Windows - Mr.Kurd - 03-29-2018

(03-29-2018, 05:24 PM)Bish0pQ Wrote: On Windows I have always used Putty. It's simple, exists for a long time and does what it needs to do. Have used CygWin before but preferred Putty.

(03-29-2018, 06:02 PM)Pikami Wrote:
(03-29-2018, 05:24 PM)Bish0pQ Wrote: On Windows I have always used Putty. It's simple, exists for a long time and does what it needs to do. Have used CygWin before but preferred Putty.

I used putty when I didn't know that CygWin existed, now I can't use putty because for me CygWin is so much better imo.
Why don't you check the CMD? I see it better, but maybe I'm wrong.


RE: SHH to CMD on Windows - Mr.Kurd - 03-29-2018

(03-28-2018, 11:11 PM)zorrophreak Wrote: (Don't forget the new Linux substrate feature for Windows 10. But screw Win10)
Didn't hear this.
(03-28-2018, 11:11 PM)zorrophreak Wrote: Also I'd suggest that you change that title to say "SSH to CMD" instead of "SHH to CMD"
ohh will change that, thank you.