+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.ly/Forum-World-News)
+--- Thread: Firefox Quantum (/Thread-Firefox-Quantum--92788)
RE: Firefox Quantum - FreightTrain - 11-16-2017
I noticed the new browser is definitely faster than the previous FF, even with some of the settings I changed to speed it up. I've never been a big fan of chrome so FF has always been my go-to. My only complaint is the updated Adblock Plus. It's not as user-friendly as before. Looks like they spent all of their time trying to make it look pretty, but killed a lot of the functionality the previous version had. It takes like 6 clicks to block a single image now and I need to get the image url beforehand to add it. You used to just right click the image and select block and that was it. Idk, maybe I'm just doing it wrong. The browser itself I have no complains on though.
RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017
(11-15-2017, 11:08 AM)mothered Wrote: That's good to know.
It didn't take too long for the stable release. Of course, It's best to download from the official website.
Thank you Mr.Kurd.
Yep surprised me too, it took a short time for the stable version.
RE: Firefox Quantum - mothered - 11-16-2017
(11-16-2017, 08:51 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote: Yep surprised me too, it took a short time for the stable version.
Evidently all went well with It's development and feedback from end users.
It's good to read FF got It right In such a short space of time.
RE: Firefox Quantum - al68 - 11-16-2017
I like the new version. Indeed is more faster and look's nice. No problems since now. This kind of updates are always welcome, they will make Chrome dev's to find other new features and so on! Good for us
RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017
(11-15-2017, 11:12 AM)Bish0pQ Wrote: Good to know indeed, this does not mean it's 100% bug free however. Usually after a release like this lots of bugs get detected in the first months after. I will delete the beta and try this out, thanks for the share buddy.
Yes it does not mean its free of bugs %100 but its a better way for fixing bugs because more users will use it tho.
RE: Firefox Quantum - Bish0pQ - 11-16-2017
(11-16-2017, 10:56 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote:(11-15-2017, 11:12 AM)Bish0pQ Wrote: Good to know indeed, this does not mean it's 100% bug free however. Usually after a release like this lots of bugs get detected in the first months after. I will delete the beta and try this out, thanks for the share buddy.
Yes it does not mean its free of bugs %100 but its a better way for fixing bugs because more users will use it tho.
I agree buddy and I've heard that it's also using way less system resources (like 30% less). That's good for low-end systems as well.
RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017
(11-15-2017, 10:02 PM)f0rg3r Wrote: This is a pretty neat looking browser . will have high hopes for this version of firefox .
they did a hard work on this version.
RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017
(11-16-2017, 11:08 AM)Bish0pQ Wrote:(11-16-2017, 10:56 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote:(11-15-2017, 11:12 AM)Bish0pQ Wrote: Good to know indeed, this does not mean it's 100% bug free however. Usually after a release like this lots of bugs get detected in the first months after. I will delete the beta and try this out, thanks for the share buddy.
Yes it does not mean its free of bugs %100 but its a better way for fixing bugs because more users will use it tho.
I agree buddy and I've heard that it's also using way less system resources (like 30% less). That's good for low-end systems as well.
Yeah my friend checked that, %30 less usable of ram than Google Chrome
RE: Firefox Quantum - Mr.Kurd - 11-16-2017
(11-15-2017, 10:24 PM)Cronus Wrote: I learned from sources that Firefox Quantum uses 30% less memory than Chrome, tested the work and was frustrated, in fact it uses much more memory than Chrome, so I continue to use Google Chrome
You are wrong
We checked it, the result was %80 Chrome used of ram but %51 Firfox used of ram.My Google Chrome used 2.8 GB for just one tab on FaceBook.
RE: Firefox Quantum - Bish0pQ - 11-16-2017
(11-16-2017, 11:12 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote: My Google Chrome used 2.8 GB for just one tab on FaceBook.
2.8 GB for a single Facebook tab?! I think Facebook is mining the shit out of your pc.