+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+---- Forum: Serious Discussion (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Serious-Discussion)
+---- Thread: Are Sexualities Unnatural? (/Thread-Are-Sexualities-Unnatural)
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Oblitus - 07-09-2016
From my view, I say they are "unnatural", but that doesn't change the fact I'm highly against homophobia.
I believe everyone has the right to be with whoever they love and couples have the right to love each other and you shouldn't change that.
I'd say they're more of "free" to stay with each other with no have/need for anyone else to change/break that.
But even so, Jay stated a good point that's a little bit supporting which is that the earth might be over-populated which will require much more resources and would start more wars and shit in the world. And even with this, the straight people should be much more than non-straight people for many reasons.
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Esoterith - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 08:53 AM)Oblitus Wrote: From my view, I say they are "unnatural", but that doesn't change the fact I'm highly against homophobia.
I believe everyone has the right to be with whoever they love and couples have the right to love each other and you shouldn't change that.
I'd say they're more of "free" to stay with each other with no have/need for anyone else to change/break that.
But even so, Jay stated a good point that's a little bit supporting which is that the earth might be over-populated which will require much more resources and would start more wars and shit in the world. And even with this, the straight people should be much more than non-straight people for many reasons.
This made me cringe.
As a stated at the majority level, emotion and in the wild homosexuality is quite common so it is natural
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Jebusfathead - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 11:05 AM)Jay Wrote:(07-09-2016, 08:53 AM)Oblitus Wrote: From my view, I say they are "unnatural", but that doesn't change the fact I'm highly against homophobia.
I believe everyone has the right to be with whoever they love and couples have the right to love each other and you shouldn't change that.
I'd say they're more of "free" to stay with each other with no have/need for anyone else to change/break that.
But even so, Jay stated a good point that's a little bit supporting which is that the earth might be over-populated which will require much more resources and would start more wars and shit in the world. And even with this, the straight people should be much more than non-straight people for many reasons.
This made me cringe.
As a stated at the majority level, emotion and in the wild homosexuality is quite common so it is natural
Why did it make you cringe?
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Zaiken - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 11:05 AM)Jay Wrote:(07-09-2016, 08:53 AM)Oblitus Wrote: From my view, I say they are "unnatural", but that doesn't change the fact I'm highly against homophobia.
I believe everyone has the right to be with whoever they love and couples have the right to love each other and you shouldn't change that.
I'd say they're more of "free" to stay with each other with no have/need for anyone else to change/break that.
But even so, Jay stated a good point that's a little bit supporting which is that the earth might be over-populated which will require much more resources and would start more wars and shit in the world. And even with this, the straight people should be much more than non-straight people for many reasons.
This made me cringe.
As a stated at the majority level, emotion and in the wild homosexuality is quite common so it is natural
But he's right a high majority of people would not be gay even if they felt that way about men, due to what people would think.
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Esoterith - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 11:26 AM)Jebusfathead Wrote:(07-09-2016, 11:05 AM)Jay Wrote:(07-09-2016, 08:53 AM)Oblitus Wrote: From my view, I say they are "unnatural", but that doesn't change the fact I'm highly against homophobia.
I believe everyone has the right to be with whoever they love and couples have the right to love each other and you shouldn't change that.
I'd say they're more of "free" to stay with each other with no have/need for anyone else to change/break that.
But even so, Jay stated a good point that's a little bit supporting which is that the earth might be over-populated which will require much more resources and would start more wars and shit in the world. And even with this, the straight people should be much more than non-straight people for many reasons.
This made me cringe.
As a stated at the majority level, emotion and in the wild homosexuality is quite common so it is natural
Why did it make you cringe?
Cause I have to explain it a million times
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Red_mybb_import25644 - 07-09-2016
I wouldn't say it's unnatural at all I mean it's not like the LGBT community is anything new there have been all types of sexuality throughout the ages "straight" people just labelled them all as weird unnatural and disgusting. As Jay said we aren't the only species to engage in same sex relationships/activities. Lions, Chimps and Dolphins have all been spotted in same-sex relationships. Also, it has been scientifically proven that being gay isn't something people just decide there is a gene in the chromosome for sex that alters if someone is gay or not. Men who are gay have a lot more of it than straight people, On this Topic, i do not hate nor care for gay/bi etc people in the sense that they are who they are and at the end of the day I have no problem or negativity towards the LGBT community.
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Esoterith - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 11:37 AM)Red Wrote: I wouldn't say it's unnatural at all I mean it's not like the LGBT community is anything new there have been all types of sexuality throughout the ages "straight" people just labelled them all as weird unnatural and disgusting. As Jay said we aren't the only species to engage in same sex relationships/activities. Lions, Chimps and Dolphins have all been spotted in same-sex relationships. Also, it has been scientifically proven that being gay isn't something people just decide there is a gene in the chromosome for sex that alters if someone is gay or not. Men who are gay have a lot more of it than straight people, On this Topic, i do not hate nor care for gay/bi etc people in the sense that they are who they are and at the end of the day I have no problem or negativity towards the LGBT community.
You forgot "*drops mic*" lol
But valid argument
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Oblitus - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 11:36 AM)Jay Wrote:(07-09-2016, 11:26 AM)Jebusfathead Wrote:(07-09-2016, 11:05 AM)Jay Wrote:(07-09-2016, 08:53 AM)Oblitus Wrote: From my view, I say they are "unnatural", but that doesn't change the fact I'm highly against homophobia.
I believe everyone has the right to be with whoever they love and couples have the right to love each other and you shouldn't change that.
I'd say they're more of "free" to stay with each other with no have/need for anyone else to change/break that.
But even so, Jay stated a good point that's a little bit supporting which is that the earth might be over-populated which will require much more resources and would start more wars and shit in the world. And even with this, the straight people should be much more than non-straight people for many reasons.
This made me cringe.
As a stated at the majority level, emotion and in the wild homosexuality is quite common so it is natural
Why did it make you cringe?
Cause I have to explain it a million times
"Cause I have to"
My post is what made you cringe?
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Esoterith - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 12:16 PM)Oblitus Wrote:(07-09-2016, 11:36 AM)Jay Wrote:(07-09-2016, 11:26 AM)Jebusfathead Wrote:(07-09-2016, 11:05 AM)Jay Wrote:(07-09-2016, 08:53 AM)Oblitus Wrote: From my view, I say they are "unnatural", but that doesn't change the fact I'm highly against homophobia.
I believe everyone has the right to be with whoever they love and couples have the right to love each other and you shouldn't change that.
I'd say they're more of "free" to stay with each other with no have/need for anyone else to change/break that.
But even so, Jay stated a good point that's a little bit supporting which is that the earth might be over-populated which will require much more resources and would start more wars and shit in the world. And even with this, the straight people should be much more than non-straight people for many reasons.
This made me cringe.
As a stated at the majority level, emotion and in the wild homosexuality is quite common so it is natural
Why did it make you cringe?
Cause I have to explain it a million times
"Cause I have to"
My post is what made you cringe?
No a part of your post. Some of the words you chose to explain how you felt on the matter.
RE: Are Sexualities Unnatural? - Cumslut - 07-09-2016
(07-08-2016, 10:37 AM)Jay Wrote:(07-06-2016, 05:19 PM)Nath Wrote: Like you mentioned, for humans to survive and evolve we need to reproduce. Therefore in my opinion I'd say anything other than straight is unnatural. Please don't kill me though.(( I respect everyone, regardless of their sexuality.
Unnatural is such a vague word. But in the wild homosexuality between animals is quite common so when it comes to natural or not, technically it is.
You may think it is or isn't in your own opinion but is it natural can be proven that it is.
Our world is over populated as is so do we really need to reproduce as much?
I highly respect you for your statement due to how you think it's weird but because of that factor you don't hate on the LGBT+ community. You respect them with the respect they give you. Judging on personality not their sexuality.
The Earth is actually FAR from over populated, only thing wrong with us as humans, is that we just destroy shit all over the place, cut down forests, throw garbage everywhere, ruin the nature and kill animals in way too large amounts. But it is not even close to being over populated.
I saw this show on Disocovery planet, where they explained that we could actually fit the entire human race, yes, every 7 billion people on Australia alone. We'd even have decent amount of space too, I couldn't find or remember what it was exactly I watched, but here:
"Well according to the CIA world fact book, Australia is 7,686,850 sq km and the world has 6,790,062,216 people. This would allow for 884 people per square mile, which is smaller than, but pretty close, to Baltimore."
It's a little bit outdated as it doesn't have 7+ billion, but the point stays the same. Being able to fit everyone on Australia.. I don't think that qualifies as over populated. Just humans being greedy.