Sinisterly
Tutorial Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Network Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Network-Hacking)
+--- Thread: Tutorial Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector (/Thread-Tutorial-Hacking-Windows-PC-via-PowerShell-Attack-Vector)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - D@rk TruTH - 08-06-2016

(08-05-2016, 05:40 PM)Mr.Kurd Wrote: thank you insha Allah i use it.

sure bro...use it...share your experience here....

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - mothered - 08-06-2016

(08-05-2016, 02:46 PM)Axari Wrote: Metasploit stubs are extremely easy to detect, especially if the antivirus has any kind of real-time protection.

This ^^^

It's a simple process when you have tools at your disposal to do the job.

Nonetheless, a good contribution.

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - Wildfire - 08-06-2016

(08-06-2016, 03:43 PM)mothered Wrote:
(08-05-2016, 02:46 PM)Axari Wrote: Metasploit stubs are extremely easy to detect, especially if the antivirus has any kind of real-time protection.

This ^^^

It's a simple process when you have tools at your disposal to do the job.

Nonetheless, a good contribution.

Pretty sure nearly every AV would pick it up in secondary analysis, even Avast DeepScreen Tongue
It's just too obvious.

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - mothered - 08-07-2016

(08-06-2016, 10:39 PM)Axari Wrote: Pretty sure nearly every AV would pick it up in secondary analysis, even Avast DeepScreen Tongue
It's just too obvious.

I think so too.

It's pretty much well-known and If not detected via signature-based analysis, any behavioral and/or heuristic methods may well pick It up.

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - Wildfire - 08-07-2016

(08-07-2016, 03:28 AM)mothered Wrote:
(08-06-2016, 10:39 PM)Axari Wrote: Pretty sure nearly every AV would pick it up in secondary analysis, even Avast DeepScreen Tongue
It's just too obvious.

I think so too.

It's pretty much well-known and If not detected via signature-based analysis, any behavioral and/or heuristic methods may well pick It up.

Snort rules for meterpreter are pretty commonplace too, this is why I recommend using reverse_https over reverse_http

Example:
Code:
# Snort rules by Didier Stevens (http://DidierStevens.com)
# 2015/04/30
# I start numbering my rules at SID 1618000
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 6.0\; Windows NT 5.1)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618000; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 6.1\; Windows NT)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618001; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 7.0\; Windows NT 6.0)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618002; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 7.0\; Windows NT 6.0\; Trident/4.0\; SIMBAR={7DB0F6DE-8DE7-4841-9084-28FA914B0F2E}\; SLCC1\; .N|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618003; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; Metasploit RSPEC)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618004; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (Windows\; U\; Windows NT 5.1\; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.221.6 Safari/525.13|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618005; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (compatible\; Googlebot/2.1\; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618006; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (compatible\; MSIE 10.0\; Windows NT 6.1\; Trident/6.0)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618007; rev:1;)


RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - Mr.Kurd - 08-07-2016

(08-07-2016, 04:48 AM)Axari Wrote:
(08-07-2016, 03:28 AM)mothered Wrote:
(08-06-2016, 10:39 PM)Axari Wrote: Pretty sure nearly every AV would pick it up in secondary analysis, even Avast DeepScreen Tongue
It's just too obvious.

I think so too.

It's pretty much well-known and If not detected via signature-based analysis, any behavioral and/or heuristic methods may well pick It up.

Snort rules for meterpreter are pretty commonplace too, this is why I recommend using reverse_https over reverse_http

Example:
Code:
# Snort rules by Didier Stevens (http://DidierStevens.com)
# 2015/04/30
# I start numbering my rules at SID 1618000
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 6.0\; Windows NT 5.1)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618000; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 6.1\; Windows NT)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618001; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 7.0\; Windows NT 6.0)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618002; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 7.0\; Windows NT 6.0\; Trident/4.0\; SIMBAR={7DB0F6DE-8DE7-4841-9084-28FA914B0F2E}\; SLCC1\; .N|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618003; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; Metasploit RSPEC)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618004; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (Windows\; U\; Windows NT 5.1\; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.221.6 Safari/525.13|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618005; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (compatible\; Googlebot/2.1\; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618006; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (compatible\; MSIE 10.0\; Windows NT 6.1\; Trident/6.0)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618007; rev:1;)
So What u say about reeverse_tcp i use it usually.

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - Wildfire - 08-07-2016

(08-07-2016, 06:27 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote:
(08-07-2016, 04:48 AM)Axari Wrote:
(08-07-2016, 03:28 AM)mothered Wrote: I think so too.

It's pretty much well-known and If not detected via signature-based analysis, any behavioral and/or heuristic methods may well pick It up.

Snort rules for meterpreter are pretty commonplace too, this is why I recommend using reverse_https over reverse_http

Example:
Code:
# Snort rules by Didier Stevens (http://DidierStevens.com)
# 2015/04/30
# I start numbering my rules at SID 1618000
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 6.0\; Windows NT 5.1)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618000; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 6.1\; Windows NT)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618001; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 7.0\; Windows NT 6.0)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618002; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; MSIE 7.0\; Windows NT 6.0\; Trident/4.0\; SIMBAR={7DB0F6DE-8DE7-4841-9084-28FA914B0F2E}\; SLCC1\; .N|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618003; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/4.0 (compatible\; Metasploit RSPEC)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618004; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (Windows\; U\; Windows NT 5.1\; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.221.6 Safari/525.13|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618005; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (compatible\; Googlebot/2.1\; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618006; rev:1;)
#alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Metasploit User Agent String"; flow:to_server,established; content:"User-Agent|3a| Mozilla/5.0 (compatible\; MSIE 10.0\; Windows NT 6.1\; Trident/6.0)|0d 0a|"; http_header; classtype:trojan-activity; reference:url,blog.didierstevens.com/2015/03/16/quickpost-metasploit-user-agent-strings/; sid:1618007; rev:1;)
So What u say about reeverse_tcp i use it usually.
I don't have example rules for meterpreter's reverse_tcp unfortunately, but reverse_tcp is unencrypted and deep packet inspection will find it and block it if it is present.

I don't recommend using anything but reverse_https in a real world environment.

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - Mr.Kurd - 08-07-2016

thank you till now i was using reverse_tcp , But what u say about rat servers like njrat 0.7 .

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - Wildfire - 08-07-2016

(08-07-2016, 09:13 PM)Mr.Kurd Wrote: thank you till now i was using reverse_tcp , But what u say about rat servers like njrat 0.7 .

All public rats are a bit bad, you have to look around here for the good stuff. If you must use something, Orcus RAT is pretty good.
I would recommend making your own, though.

RE: Hacking Windows PC via PowerShell Attack Vector - Mr.Kurd - 08-08-2016

u r right , i'm with this too , i wanna make a rat with java languge,,, java is good to this or not?
But i think C++ is best to make rat, but i'm interesting in java.