(12-28-2015, 03:19 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:17 PM)Continental Wrote: When you purchased a group, please make it as HQ as possible.

You cant just easily make something High Quality. Depending on the members and owner, it could turn into hell.

(12-28-2015, 03:20 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:19 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:17 PM)Continental Wrote: When you purchased a group, please make it as HQ as possible.

You cant just easily make something High Quality. Depending on the members and owner, it could turn into hell.

That's why he should only accept applicants that have shown their past experience with user groups and/or Forums.

(12-28-2015, 03:22 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:20 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:19 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:17 PM)Continental Wrote: When you purchased a group, please make it as HQ as possible.

You cant just easily make something High Quality. Depending on the members and owner, it could turn into hell.

That's why he should only accept applicants that have shown their past experience with user groups and/or Forums.

But i'm talking about the leader more than anything.

(12-28-2015, 03:23 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:22 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:20 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:19 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:17 PM)Continental Wrote: When you purchased a group, please make it as HQ as possible.

You cant just easily make something High Quality. Depending on the members and owner, it could turn into hell.

That's why he should only accept applicants that have shown their past experience with user groups and/or Forums.

But i'm talking about the leader more than anything.

I think that every owner would like to have their user group as stable and high quality as possible.

(12-28-2015, 03:25 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:23 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:22 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:20 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:19 PM)Nysa Wrote: You cant just easily make something High Quality. Depending on the members and owner, it could turn into hell.

That's why he should only accept applicants that have shown their past experience with user groups and/or Forums.

But i'm talking about the leader more than anything.

I think that every owner would like to have their user group as stable and high quality as possible.

Very true. But say if someone who's new to forums, has $200-300 laying around and wants to spend it. 

He decides to buy a group, although he's new.

The usergroup happens to post complete bullshit and lies.

(this is an example)


Then what, huh?

(12-28-2015, 03:27 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:25 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:23 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:22 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:20 PM)Continental Wrote: That's why he should only accept applicants that have shown their past experience with user groups and/or Forums.

But i'm talking about the leader more than anything.

I think that every owner would like to have their user group as stable and high quality as possible.

Very true. But say if someone who's new to forums, has $200-300 laying around and wants to spend it. 

He decides to buy a group, although he's new.

The usergroup happens to post complete bullshit and lies.

(this is an example)


Then what, huh?

I agree to that, that's something we have to keep in our mind. It is common (Not in every case) that new users are happened to post more useless posts then users who have past experience with Forums and user groups.

(12-28-2015, 03:29 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:27 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:25 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:23 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:22 PM)Nysa Wrote: But i'm talking about the leader more than anything.

I think that every owner would like to have their user group as stable and high quality as possible.

Very true. But say if someone who's new to forums, has $200-300 laying around and wants to spend it. 

He decides to buy a group, although he's new.

The usergroup happens to post complete bullshit and lies.

(this is an example)


Then what, huh?

I agree to that, that's something we have to keep in our mind. It is common (Not in every case) that new users are happened to post more useless posts then users who have past experience with Forums and user groups.

That's very agreeable. Hopefully he can see our discussion before planning on purchasing. He needs to plan out how he's going to run it. (if he does purchase a group)

(12-28-2015, 03:35 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:29 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:27 PM)Continental Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:25 PM)Nysa Wrote:

(12-28-2015, 03:23 PM)Continental Wrote: I think that every owner would like to have their user group as stable and high quality as possible.

Very true. But say if someone who's new to forums, has $200-300 laying around and wants to spend it. 

He decides to buy a group, although he's new.

The usergroup happens to post complete bullshit and lies.

(this is an example)


Then what, huh?

I agree to that, that's something we have to keep in our mind. It is common (Not in every case) that new users are happened to post more useless posts then users who have past experience with Forums and user groups.

That's very agreeable. Hopefully he can see our discussion before planning on purchasing. He needs to plan out how he's going to run it. (if he does purchase a group)

Let's hope that all upcoming owners will read this nice conversation we have!  mile: