![]() |
|
UK MPs have to debate Marijuana Legality - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General) +--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.ly/Forum-World-News) +--- Thread: UK MPs have to debate Marijuana Legality (/Thread-UK-MPs-have-to-debate-Marijuana-Legality) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: UK MPs have to debate Marijuana Legality - lux - 07-26-2015 (07-26-2015, 01:04 AM)Eclipse Wrote: Medical products were exempt: The Queen can't actually have any say in parliamentary law making. The final stage of passing a bill is 'Royal Ascent', where the Queen is to read over and pass the bill. This doesn't happen. One of the Queen's minions merely pass it through, the Queen doesn't read it. The last monarch to stop a bill going through was Victoria, IIRC. RE: UK MPs have to debate Marijuana Legality - Oni - 07-27-2015 (07-25-2015, 10:51 PM)roger_smith Wrote: holy fuck, online petitions mean something in the UK? They don't matter too much in the USA... RE: UK MPs have to debate Marijuana Legality - Satan - 07-27-2015 (07-27-2015, 12:01 AM)Oni Wrote: They don't matter too much in the USA... Where do they matter? Petitions in general now are somewhat laughable, in any fashion or form. RE: UK MPs have to debate Marijuana Legality - roger_smith - 07-27-2015 it really depends on the petition. A ballot proposal has a big chance to change things. Colorado is an example of a petition circulation causing big change. RE: UK MPs have to debate Marijuana Legality - DarkKnight - 08-26-2015 Our government has replied. Quote:Despite the potential opportunity offered by legalisation to raise revenue through taxation, there would be costs in relation to administrative, compliance and law enforcement activities, as well as the wider costs of drug prevention and health services. Source @Eclipse RE: UK MPs have to debate Marijuana Legality - Exkr - 08-26-2015 As long as people don't go around saying "420 blaze it faggot" or some weed culture shit, then I don't care if it's legalised. |