![]() |
|
Defining Gravedigging - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Announcements) +---- Forum: Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Suggestions) +----- Forum: Old Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Old-Suggestions) +----- Thread: Defining Gravedigging (/Thread-Defining-Gravedigging) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Defining Gravedigging - mothered - 08-08-2015 (08-08-2015, 04:57 AM)Rock Wrote: Something one might consider to add to this definition, gravedigging is not defined by the age of the thread (When the original post was made), it's the last post/bump in the thread that determines whether it's really gravedigging or not. You can pretty much keep a thread alive for a long time by bumping it often and having other people post pretty frequently. (You can certainly disagree if you want, but it makes sense to me that you only count the last post before necrobumper leaves his post). No doubt you do have some valid points, but there's a fine line with what Is/Isn't considered worthy of grave digging. For example, one member may find a given thread as a point of Interest, thus believes It's warranted to resurrect It, whereby many other members may not find It useful at all. That's where all the commotion may erupt. For that reason (and of course many others), It's quite arduous to set concrete and conclusive rules and guidelines pertaining to grave digging. If a staff member closes the thread due grave digging, It's at his/her discretion and If need be on request, I'm sure staff can provide the reason(s) as to why the thread was not deemed to remain active. RE: Defining Gravedigging - Eclipse - 08-08-2015 Well, according to the definition of gravedigging highlighted in the OP, this thread wasn't gravedug. Ironically...
RE: Defining Gravedigging - Jiggly - 08-09-2015 I'm glad there's a discussion about this as I (and perhaps other members) were in a grey area about what it means. I was under the impression that it meant bumping very old threads However, I think the opinions stated by Oni and OP are very agreeable. Sounds like the bottom line is keeping good-high quality activity in relevant areas of the forum. |