+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding)
+--- Forum: C, C++, & Obj-C (https://sinister.ly/Forum-C-C-Obj-C)
+--- Thread: C++ IDE for Linux (/Thread-C-IDE-for-Linux)
Pages:
1
2
RE: C++ IDE for Linux - Deque - 06-06-2013
(06-06-2013, 05:15 AM)Ex094 Wrote: @Deque Netbeans has compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 as I said in my previous post, Also you said about using Unix as an IDE, Lots of people use it but don't you think a good IDE can increase your productivity?
Also no one told my any thing about GUI Programming with C++ in Linux, I mean can I make GUI for my programs with NetBeans like in Visual Studio
Sorry, I overread the issue with NetBeans.
If you are happy with CodeBlocks, use it.
Quote:but don't you think a good IDE can increase your productivity?
Of course I do think that. But what do you miss if you have, i.e.:
syntax highlighting, code navigation, autoclosing brackets, ... - vim
compiling - gcc
build instructions - make
debugging - gdb
An IDE does the same.
(06-06-2013, 05:48 AM)Linuxephus™ Wrote: @Deque:
{Same can be said for NetBeans (also written in and mainly used for Java), except for the plugin support which is better in Eclipse.}
-->>Which is why I directly referred to Eclipse instead of Netbeans.
{But I disagree with the default function and purpose of it being for Java. Depending on the version you download, you will have a default with Java or C++ or other in Eclipse.}
-->>Originally when Eclipse was created/started as a project by IBM Canada, it was solely (infer default) used as a Java-based replacement circa 2001.
Hence, default use and strongest reference defers to Java developement above all else, even to this day.
Java and CVS support is provided as default, with additional third party plugins (version control systems) of an open source and proprietary nature that allows a model of "equal creation" due to Eclipse using a small runtime kernel that all version control systems (plugins) are implemented on top of.
The C++ version you speak of for that matter caters merely to C++ by having that particular version control system implemented solely as a C++ IDE.
This "suite" has to be packaged seperately versus the default Eclipse package normally used from spec.
I'd have mentioned VIM, Bluefish, or even Emacs-IDE myself considering I have all manner of such installed on my own workstation, but chose to follow in line with Ex094's query by keeping it simple.
In that case I have to agree with you. :ok:
RE: C++ IDE for Linux - Linuxephus™ - 06-06-2013
(06-06-2013, 03:08 PM)Deque Wrote: In that case I have to agree with you. :ok:
In that case, I have to agree with your agreeance.:lol:
RE: C++ IDE for Linux - ArkPhaze - 06-06-2013
(06-06-2013, 12:09 PM)Ex094 Wrote: @ArkPhaze Thanks, Looks like a decent IDE but I'm using Code Blocks currently and I'm pretty happy with it. Don't know why people say it's bad
Code::Blocks isn't bad, I use it on Windows for C. C++ I just end up using VS because it's by far the best IDE i've ever used hands down. Any language that I can write using that IDE, I'll use it. Just because it's most commonly known for .NET languages does not mean it's a junk IDE.