![]() |
|
iPentagram - ShellBooter, DorkScanner, Vuln.Scanner, IPTracer, TxtEncrypt [MediaFire] - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Hacking Tools (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking-Tools) +--- Thread: iPentagram - ShellBooter, DorkScanner, Vuln.Scanner, IPTracer, TxtEncrypt [MediaFire] (/Thread-iPentagram-ShellBooter-DorkScanner-Vuln-Scanner-IPTracer-TxtEncrypt-MediaFire) |
RE: iPentagram - ArcaneFx - 04-18-2013 (04-17-2013, 07:31 AM)Deque Wrote: Looks great. How long have you been programming? I've been programming for a long time now but started with Visual Basic.NET close to two years ago. A new set of strings is generated and set as the windowtitle at run-time because I'm extremely paranoid. RE: iPentagram - ArcaneFx - 04-18-2013 (04-17-2013, 07:31 AM)Deque Wrote: Looks great. How long have you been programming? I've been programming for a long time now but started with Visual Basic.NET close to two years ago. A new set of strings is generated and set as the windowtitle at run-time because I'm extremely paranoid. RE: iPentagram - noize - 04-18-2013 (04-18-2013, 10:23 AM)Arcane.cfg Wrote:(04-17-2013, 07:31 AM)Deque Wrote: Looks great. How long have you been programming? But, if I might ask, why? I mean, might you explain me what you're paranoid about? I'm PMing you right now. RE: iPentagram - noize - 04-18-2013 (04-18-2013, 10:23 AM)Arcane.cfg Wrote:(04-17-2013, 07:31 AM)Deque Wrote: Looks great. How long have you been programming? But, if I might ask, why? I mean, might you explain me what you're paranoid about? I'm PMing you right now. a - SyntaX - 04-19-2013 I cant really figure out why its clean? When there's a Booter it virus scan should come back with "Hackingtool" or some like that? or am i wrong? a - SyntaX - 04-19-2013 I cant really figure out why its clean? When there's a Booter it virus scan should come back with "Hackingtool" or some like that? or am i wrong? RE: a - noize - 04-19-2013 (04-19-2013, 07:53 AM)SyntaX Wrote: I cant really figure out why its clean? Easily, when you see that, is because that's been inserted manually in databases. So, average users would just see a "Infected" and click the remove button; while, hackers, would find it is clean. In case of some other software, it is instantly detected as actual malware, as some codes match with others in the database. I remember having made once a completely lecit file which had been detected, and a rabbit working also as a worm and virus which had resulted clean with no encryption methods. Of course, if it spreaded, AVs would insert manually the trigger for detecting it, just as for every widespread malware. After all, this has also got no DoS functions (just booting), and so it may be easily found clean. If this becomes a much-used software, it will surely be inserted. RE: a - noize - 04-19-2013 (04-19-2013, 07:53 AM)SyntaX Wrote: I cant really figure out why its clean? Easily, when you see that, is because that's been inserted manually in databases. So, average users would just see a "Infected" and click the remove button; while, hackers, would find it is clean. In case of some other software, it is instantly detected as actual malware, as some codes match with others in the database. I remember having made once a completely lecit file which had been detected, and a rabbit working also as a worm and virus which had resulted clean with no encryption methods. Of course, if it spreaded, AVs would insert manually the trigger for detecting it, just as for every widespread malware. After all, this has also got no DoS functions (just booting), and so it may be easily found clean. If this becomes a much-used software, it will surely be inserted. RE: a - Deque - 04-19-2013 (04-19-2013, 07:53 AM)SyntaX Wrote: I cant really figure out why its clean? noize already explained it well. Anti virus software has basically two methods to determine an malicious programs. 1. It has identifying information about the malicious program in the database. 2. It uses heuristics to determine if a file is infected. Heuristics can be false, though. That means if a malicious program isn't in the database nor recognized by the heuristics, the AV will say it is clean. On the other hand you can create a program that is not malicious, but will be recognized as such, because it behaves somewhat similar to a malicious program. An anti virus scanner therefor can never prove that a program is malicious nor that a program isn't. RE: a - Deque - 04-19-2013 (04-19-2013, 07:53 AM)SyntaX Wrote: I cant really figure out why its clean? noize already explained it well. Anti virus software has basically two methods to determine an malicious programs. 1. It has identifying information about the malicious program in the database. 2. It uses heuristics to determine if a file is infected. Heuristics can be false, though. That means if a malicious program isn't in the database nor recognized by the heuristics, the AV will say it is clean. On the other hand you can create a program that is not malicious, but will be recognized as such, because it behaves somewhat similar to a malicious program. An anti virus scanner therefor can never prove that a program is malicious nor that a program isn't. |