+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Hacking Tools (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking-Tools)
+--- Thread: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) (/Thread-HC-Official-Multiencoder-Python)
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - Deque - 07-06-2013
(07-06-2013, 04:47 PM)noize Wrote: I don't know if you should be shortening rot13 with rot, base64 with base... What if we add other rot versions or other bases based algorithms? rev = reverse is fine, but for the others I don't think so. Also, you're taking away 2 chars, I think the user could manage the effort.
rot13 is the most common case of all rot algorithms as well is base64 (i.e. compared to base32), so I will leave those abbreviations, no matter if other algorithms follow.
I myself find it far more easy to type base than base64, because I have to stretch the fingers very far to get to the numbers. I also tend to forget the numbers for hazz, zong and so on, because they are arbitrary (those are still base64 algorithms, just with other alphabets).
It's just a dictionary with abbreviations, I can change that easily if we get more algorithms with similar names. I don't see the problem.
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - Deque - 07-06-2013
(07-06-2013, 04:47 PM)noize Wrote: I don't know if you should be shortening rot13 with rot, base64 with base... What if we add other rot versions or other bases based algorithms? rev = reverse is fine, but for the others I don't think so. Also, you're taking away 2 chars, I think the user could manage the effort.
rot13 is the most common case of all rot algorithms as well is base64 (i.e. compared to base32), so I will leave those abbreviations, no matter if other algorithms follow.
I myself find it far more easy to type base than base64, because I have to stretch the fingers very far to get to the numbers. I also tend to forget the numbers for hazz, zong and so on, because they are arbitrary (those are still base64 algorithms, just with other alphabets).
It's just a dictionary with abbreviations, I can change that easily if we get more algorithms with similar names. I don't see the problem.
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - Deque - 07-06-2013
I updated to version 0.2
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - Deque - 07-06-2013
I updated to version 0.2
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - Psycho_Coder - 07-06-2013
Great! However I have just got started
and so do others. I guess We shoud create a library of the codes and then upoad it to Github with name "HCRepository" , just a suggestion
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - Psycho_Coder - 07-06-2013
Great! However I have just got started
and so do others. I guess We shoud create a library of the codes and then upoad it to Github with name "HCRepository" , just a suggestion
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - Psycho_Coder - 07-06-2013
Great! However I have just got started
and so do others. I guess We shoud create a library of the codes and then upoad it to Github with name "HCRepository" , just a suggestion
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - noize - 07-06-2013
(07-06-2013, 10:03 PM)Psycho_Coder Wrote: Great! However I have just got started
What do you mean with "just got started"? You mean with programming? You're pretty good if you just got started. However, if that's what you mean, I just got started too, but I don't know about others. But I think I don't really get what you mean. And about the Git repo, you mean for this proj only or for all HC group projects?
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - noize - 07-06-2013
(07-06-2013, 10:03 PM)Psycho_Coder Wrote: Great! However I have just got started
What do you mean with "just got started"? You mean with programming? You're pretty good if you just got started. However, if that's what you mean, I just got started too, but I don't know about others. But I think I don't really get what you mean. And about the Git repo, you mean for this proj only or for all HC group projects?
RE: [HC-Official] Multiencoder (Python) - noize - 07-06-2013
(07-06-2013, 10:03 PM)Psycho_Coder Wrote: Great! However I have just got started
What do you mean with "just got started"? You mean with programming? You're pretty good if you just got started. However, if that's what you mean, I just got started too, but I don't know about others. But I think I don't really get what you mean. And about the Git repo, you mean for this proj only or for all HC group projects?