![]() |
|
Virus in C++... - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding) +--- Forum: C, C++, & Obj-C (https://sinister.ly/Forum-C-C-Obj-C) +--- Thread: Virus in C++... (/Thread-Virus-in-C) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Virus in C++... - muhammad fakir - 09-20-2012 22 yo may i know why u asking? (09-20-2012, 01:26 PM)Frooxius Wrote: This topic title is extremely misleading, because this is not a virus in C++, it's just a batch code wrapped in C++ code and the batch code is not a virus either. you're legend right? :yes: we are here to sharing and to get some fun... c++ i know that must be run in a program.. anyway thanks for your reply and joined this thread.
RE: Virus in C++... - ArkPhaze - 09-23-2012 (04-11-2012, 05:19 PM)chipp Wrote: well, why don't you just use system() ? your batch file doesn't have an autorun feature too (as far as i can see...), so why creating another file? (05-03-2012, 12:56 PM)Ambiguous Wrote:(05-03-2012, 12:42 PM)Cyclops Wrote: May I ask what this virus exactly does? I have no C++ (nor any other programming) experience so I can't make it up myself from reading the provided code, but I would like to know what it does in case I decide I would like to use it. (09-19-2012, 04:49 PM)killerOfCode Wrote: I'm sorry, but this code really doesn't make sense. Why not use system() commands instead of making a new batch file. I count 3 people so far suggesting system() in C++... :nono: Are you serious? The use of system() is bad. And this is not a C++ virus, even as Frooxious has already stated, why would you be coding in C++ if you're just going to utilize the functionality of a batch file which calls other command line executables anyways? That's idiocy. ~ArkPhaze RE: Virus in C++... - killerOfCode - 09-23-2012 I know that it would be bad, I'm just saying that it's really worthless to claim that the program is C++ when it is just batch code... RE: Virus in C++... - Rodaxoleaux the Lab Rat - 09-23-2012 It IS C++. It's just that the only thing in the c++ code is Batch. RE: Virus in C++... - ArkPhaze - 09-24-2012 (09-23-2012, 10:20 PM)Rodaxoleaux the Lab Rat Wrote: It IS C++. It's just that the only thing in the c++ code is Batch. Yeah, and read the title. Do you think then, considering all aspects that this "virus" itself, was coded in C++, or Batch? :whistle: You pointed out the obvious, now look at the logic behind what others including myself and Frooxious mentioned about the confliction between the title and his code. ~ArkPhaze RE: Virus in C++... - LunatiC - 03-21-2013 Isn't that code bit old? Because there is <iostream.h> instead of <iostream>. RE: Virus in C++... - Halle1982 - 03-28-2013 Thank for the tutorial RE: Virus in C++... - Halle1982 - 03-28-2013 Thank for the tutorial |