+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: Announcements (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Announcements)
+---- Forum: Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Suggestions)
+----- Forum: Old Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Old-Suggestions)
+----- Thread: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! (/Thread-WE-NEED-AN-ASM-SUBFORUM)
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - superMAUS - 05-01-2014
(04-30-2014, 06:01 PM)Dyme Wrote: What kinds of "advanced exploitation" are we talking about here. I can't really think of anything much more outside of memory corruption in terms of vulnerability exploitation.
And idk if we really need a whole subforum for something that will most likely not be very active.
As if memory corruption wasnt by far the best means of exploitation. It can give you remote access or priviledge escalation whereas a language like PHP is widely seen as GREAT for web exploitation when the actual payloads are more often than not much worse.
(05-01-2014, 04:59 AM)xornull Wrote: The coding section itself is inactive as hell, and I doubt many would know assembly.
But hey why not assembly rulez
As if that wouldnt be the reason to have an assembly section in the first place.
Also its not as if we cant trial this.. Activity really doesnt matter, its not as if it has negative impacts.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - xornull - 05-01-2014
(05-01-2014, 07:57 AM)vegimite Wrote: As if memory corruption wasnt by far the best means of exploitation. It can give you remote access or priviledge escalation whereas a language like PHP is widely seen as GREAT for web exploitation when the actual payloads are more often than not much worse.
As if that wouldnt be the reason to have an assembly section in the first place.
Also its not as if we cant trial this.. Activity really doesnt matter, its not as if it has negative impacts.
But by all means I would love to have an asm subforum..
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - superMAUS - 05-02-2014
(05-01-2014, 02:07 PM)xornull Wrote: But by all means I would love to have an asm subforum..
yas I know your a good member
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - mirage - 05-02-2014
I'm learning asm and I think a subforum would be a great resource and way to share knowledge with the community.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - superMAUS - 05-03-2014
(05-02-2014, 05:34 PM)mirage Wrote: I'm learning asm and I think a subforum would be a great resource and way to share knowledge with the community.
good indeed, keep up the learning!
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Alan Turing - 05-03-2014
(05-01-2014, 05:02 AM)Duubz Wrote: >The coding section itself is inactive as hell
That's because I practically stole the Python section and have decided to wait until more people post.
>I doubt many would know assembly.
Do you know what website you're on right now?
The only person I think knows Assembly is @w00t
Other than that, I don't think there's that many people..
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Equinox - 05-03-2014
(05-03-2014, 01:42 AM)Kosaki Wrote: The only person I think knows Assembly is @w00t
Other than that, I don't think there's that many people..
No, I think a lot of people know ASM, just most also happen to be inactive.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - superMAUS - 05-03-2014
(05-03-2014, 01:42 AM)Kosaki Wrote: The only person I think knows Assembly is @w00t
Other than that, I don't think there's that many people..
I know basic asm, I asume people like @Reiko do too.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Alan Turing - 05-03-2014
(05-03-2014, 01:48 AM)vegimite Wrote: I know basic asm, I asume people like @Reiko do too.
Starfall said he only knows a little bit.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - superMAUS - 05-03-2014
(05-03-2014, 01:58 AM)Kosaki Wrote: Starfall said he only knows a little bit.
Ahh, anyhow all the more reason to get one up so people can learn.