![]() |
|
Python vs Perl - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding) +--- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding--71) +--- Thread: Python vs Perl (/Thread-Python-vs-Perl) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Python vs Perl - Alan Turing - 04-17-2014 That's slightly fucked up RE: Python vs Perl - w00t - 04-18-2014 (04-17-2014, 11:10 PM)Duubz Wrote: Yes, I have heard of both. Protip, PHP is Perl-based, and most sites have a CGI script or two. RE: Python vs Perl - 3SidedSquare - 04-18-2014 (04-17-2014, 09:10 PM)misnar Wrote: Explain how Perl is 'lower level'? Perl can be compiled, truly compiled, where python 'compiled' is just a little speed-boost for the interpreter. (I think) RE: Python vs Perl - w00t - 04-18-2014 You're wrong. As I said to the glorious misnar on XMPP, I view perl as lower level because you don't reply as much on global functions, sockets are less automated, and there's no GIL fucking with concurrency. RE: Python vs Perl - superMAUS - 04-23-2014 (04-18-2014, 03:03 AM)w00t Wrote: You're wrong. That doesnt make it lower level, just means that there are more libraries built in. |