![]() |
|
Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General) +--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge) +---- Forum: Serious Discussion (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Serious-Discussion) +---- Thread: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? (/Thread-Nuclear-War-World-War-3-End-of-The-World) |
RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - ralfy - 07-06-2013 (01-25-2013, 07:33 PM)Der Anarchist Wrote: Eh, it does have some interesting history facts, but it's no better than one of those conspiracy theory documentaries. Very interesting, nonetheless. The phenomenon of the petro-dollar is well-known. Conspiracy theory.
RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - lux - 07-06-2013 (07-06-2013, 06:51 PM)ralfy Wrote: The phenomenon of the petro-dollar is well-known. Nice grave digging. RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - ralfy - 07-27-2013 (07-06-2013, 07:29 PM)xLinear Wrote: Nice grave digging. Grave digging only for the ignorant. RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - w00t - 07-27-2013 Why do people act like petro-dollars are some huge conspiracy? Basically, the US did what empires do best, and told other nations with things that they needed "yo g, if we're top priority when you sell yo shit, we'll protect you." Hegemony is a wonderful thing. RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - BlueScreen - 07-28-2013 (01-24-2013, 06:43 AM)Banshee Wrote: I think you're being a little over dramatic. If America was to be be threatened seriously by a nuclear attack. All first world countries will engage. Implying the US is a first world country. //Edit nice grave digging user above me. RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - Oni - 07-28-2013 (07-28-2013, 11:52 AM)BlueScreen Wrote: Implying the US is a first world country. Still is. Living conditions in the US beat most places. RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - Eren Yeager - 07-28-2013 They won't do anything. It's been like that for a while now, Kim Jong and shit. RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - BreShiE - 07-28-2013 Please close this thread. The conversation is old as fuck and there's no more threat from NK. RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - Feat - 07-28-2013 Honestly, WW3 will most likely be caused by a power country, not NK. And the fact that he called it off is nothing more than proof to show that he is a little kid who cant back his threats. RE: Nuclear War? World War 3? End of The World? - Feat - 07-28-2013 (07-28-2013, 08:23 PM)GHETTO_GOLD Wrote: this is just some small pon to take you away from the bigger picture. world war three .. how long ago was that .... the cold war ... its the united nations that are at war with the rest of em . its way bigger then this .. its the controll of population that there responding too . the media in the u.s. is showing you the worst of the world that couldnt or wouldnt buy in. now .. on this you should go off of . project heart and other conspiracy is rooted from some truth. population controll through the innocenss of natural disaster. monsoons on the less fourtinate . most will be done through this unstoppable force. ..... the controlling of this is modern day war fare. * please my boi . come through with your opinon on this and brake that toast with a dogg. ..... Please my boi, fix your grammar as I didnt understand anything you just said other than population control. |