![]() |
|
Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General) +--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge) +---- Forum: Serious Discussion (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Serious-Discussion) +---- Thread: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? (/Thread-Cancer-Are-they-in-it-for-the-money) |
RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - midget_pro - 03-31-2014 it's not just cancer its std's the population would rise if they where cured if you want to talk money religion is a huge profit maker and its tax free RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - Hellborn - 03-31-2014 Cannabis oil cures Cancer. RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - dopest - 03-31-2014 Personally, I don't think they're in it for the money. Yeah, there's some cures for cancer, but they might not be the safest. Cancer is a huge problem, however much it costs I'm cool with. All the research and trials they have done, the price is pretty understandable. (Considering how long they've been studying it) RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - Oni - 03-31-2014 (03-31-2014, 05:13 AM)dopest Wrote: Personally, I don't think they're in it for the money. Cures? Maybe undiscovered one. To date, there has been no documented cure. However, there are treatments. (03-30-2014, 03:24 PM)w00t Wrote: Yes, we need people to die, but if medicine were purely money motivated, they would make considerably more off you if you were kept alive to the point that multiple organs started just failing. You should totally put me in your will.
RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - w00t - 03-31-2014 All of my assets, after paying for dying costs, are to be donated in equal parts to the Wounded Warrior Project, the Electronic Frontier Fondation, and the American Red Cross. No, cannabis oil doesn't cure cancer. I would bother to prove you wrong, but my instincts tell me any debate is futile. RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - dopest - 03-31-2014 (03-31-2014, 06:58 AM)Oni Wrote: Cures? Maybe undiscovered one. To date, there has been no documented cure. However, there are treatments.This might sound really stupid, but we were talking about stem cells in biology. You think they could maybe be used as a treatment in someway? Or are they primarily for the recovery of lost body parts? RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - lux - 03-31-2014 (03-31-2014, 04:25 PM)dopest Wrote: This might sound really stupid, but we were talking about stem cells in biology. You think they could maybe be used as a treatment in someway? Or are they primarily for the recovery of lost body parts? You could technically reproduce the cancerous organ and replace it. But then again we can technically decompose the molecular structure of rubbish and make it into diamond. RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - w00t - 03-31-2014 (03-31-2014, 04:25 PM)dopest Wrote: This might sound really stupid, but we were talking about stem cells in biology. You think they could maybe be used as a treatment in someway? Or are they primarily for the recovery of lost body parts? Kiiind of. The killer part of cancer isn't a lack of new cells, it's the exact opposite. RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - dopest - 03-31-2014 (03-31-2014, 05:25 PM)w00t Wrote: Kiiind of. The killer part of cancer isn't a lack of new cells, it's the exact opposite. Ah, gotcha. My bad. Re: RE: Cancer - Are they in it for the money? - Oni - 03-31-2014 (03-31-2014, 05:25 PM)w00t Wrote: Kiiind of. The killer part of cancer isn't a lack of new cells, it's the exact opposite. Yeah, it's an overgrowth of cells. |