+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Design (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Design)
+--- Forum: Feedback (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Feedback)
+--- Thread: Let's go to the beach! ~ (/Thread-Let-s-go-to-the-beach)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Let's go to the beach! ~ - Oni - 10-12-2013
It's nice, but really bright!
RE: Let's go to the beach! ~ - Care - 10-12-2013
Thank you all! There's always room for improvement!
RE: Let's go to the beach! ~ - BlueScreen - 10-12-2013
Care. I can with hands on my penis say that it is beutiful and perfect in every way possible. ily.
RE: Let's go to the beach! ~ - Kureo - 10-12-2013
The image is pretty nice, though I prefer the use of fractal rather than vectors for background and such. Though that is left on to personal preference so I will not label it as a fault on this piece. However, I will say that the picture is overly sharpen, well everything but the text looks over-sharpen really. You could try to use Smart Sharpen or High Pass to sharpen it more accurate rather than just using the quick Sharpen. I also found the text too dominating in this signature, it was the first thing I looked at and signatures that uses renders should do this. The render should be the dominating variable of a signature like this, not the text.
Side Note
On a little side note, I would just like to comment on your reaction to the feedback you've gotten on the sharpness of this image. You've commented stating either that the image isn't overly sharpen or that you at least don't think so. Now this is okay, as everyone has a different opinion. But the only comment from you that I really didn't enjoy reading was the following;
(10-12-2013, 06:57 PM)Care Wrote: I only sharpened it once. I never over-sharpen my work. Thanks for the close analysis though!
I didn't like to read this, as you place yourself higher up as an artist by bluntly out saying that you never do a mistake with this certain option/tool. That is both ignorant and a bad way for an artist to act in my opinion.