Undecided The SE section - Printable Version

Undecided The SE section - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: Announcements (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Announcements)
+---- Forum: Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Suggestions)
+----- Forum: Old Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Old-Suggestions)
+----- Thread: Undecided The SE section (/Thread-Undecided-The-SE-section)

Pages: 1 2 3 4

RE: The SE section - Ordnael92 - 08-27-2022

(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote: I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)

This is a nice idea, although I too don't know about its feasibility

RE: The SE section - WLT17 - 08-27-2022

(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323 @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here

Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I think registering to view is a must, would improve privacy too as mentioned by others. Doesn't take more than 5 mins to register. Definitely against the comment to view feature, that has never made sense to me.

RE: The SE section - mothered - 08-27-2022

(08-27-2022, 11:25 AM)WLT17 Wrote: Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

He spammed approximately 15 threads In the Introductions forum, not knowing It didn't add to his post count.

He also grave dug a few threads.

RE: The SE section - stealthysnake88 - 08-27-2022

(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323 @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here

Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)

I agree with this Canadian

(08-27-2022, 01:57 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323 @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here

Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)
I agree with this Canadian

@Canadian Moose

RE: The SE section - Defeat - 08-27-2022

(08-27-2022, 12:18 PM)mothered Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 11:25 AM)WLT17 Wrote: Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.
He spammed approximately 15 threads In the Introductions forum, not knowing It didn't add to his post count.

He also grave dug a few threads.

Hopefully he got what he came for before the banhammer

RE: The SE section - mothered - 08-27-2022

(08-27-2022, 03:52 PM)Canadian Moose Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 12:18 PM)mothered Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 11:25 AM)WLT17 Wrote: Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.
He spammed approximately 15 threads In the Introductions forum, not knowing It didn't add to his post count.

He also grave dug a few threads.
Hopefully he got what he came for before the banhammer

He chose the behaviour, he chose the consequences.

RE: The SE section - stevenadams2323 - 08-28-2022

(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323 @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here

Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)

Yh the only problem with this is that If someone left it idle or something.

I’m all for the moves. It’s too much random and repetitive shit and some ppl don’t contribute enough to just be getting the info. Some info shared here is too hard for meady ppl to get 😂😂

RE: The SE section - fractalmind0 - 08-28-2022

(08-28-2022, 02:43 AM)stevenadams2323 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323 @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here

Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)

Yh the only problem with this is that If someone left it idle or something.

I’m all for the moves. It’s too much random and repetitive shit and some ppl don’t contribute enough to just be getting the info. Some info shared here is too hard for meady ppl to get 😂😂

Yeah, that's why I suggested to also implement an option to auto-disconnect after 30 or 60 minutes of inactivity on the website haha.

But I understand the logistics and feasibility of this solution could be an issue.

RE: The SE section - Andrea Bags - 08-28-2022

(08-28-2022, 03:37 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-28-2022, 02:43 AM)stevenadams2323 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote: I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)

Yh the only problem with this is that If someone left it idle or something.

I’m all for the moves. It’s too much random and repetitive shit and some ppl don’t contribute enough to just be getting the info. Some info shared here is too hard for meady ppl to get 😂😂

Yeah, that's why I suggested to also implement an option to auto-disconnect after 30 or 60 minutes of inactivity on the website haha.

But I understand the logistics and feasibility of this solution could be an issue.

thinks there's already a timer

RE: The SE section - Dyne - 08-28-2022

IMO, and I haven't been here that long, there should be a bare minimum requirement of registering to view the forum.
It ensures at least minimal commitment of userbase. It can still be indexed with SEO bots and crawl bots.

I doubt it will help much in regards to leaking, but it may improve engagement under CRM.
Forum has a beautiful design, some things like the upgrade system should be in a BTCPay server / automatic system
But free to register.

With the forum activity in general across many competing forums here being so low, bare level commitment seems to have worked for the more active ones.