+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding)
+--- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding--71)
+--- Thread: Which programming language is hard to reverse engineering? (/Thread-Which-programming-language-is-hard-to-reverse-engineering)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Which programming language is hard to reverse engineering? - zak776 - 01-24-2024
(03-13-2020, 02:03 PM)Hack3rcon Wrote: Hello,Low-level languages like C and C++ can be harder to reverse engineer due to the direct correspondence between the source code and machine code, making it more difficult to reconstruct high-level structures. Additionally, optimizations and obfuscation techniques can be applied to make reverse engineering more complex.
Which programming language is hard to reverse engineering? I mean is that a program that written by which programming language is hard to reverse engineering?
Thank you.
Languages that rely on compilation to bytecode or intermediate languages, like Java or .NET languages (C#, VB.NET), also add a layer of abstraction, making it somewhat more challenging to reverse engineer compared to languages with a direct correspondence to machine code.
RE: Which programming language is hard to reverse engineering? - r00f3rr - 01-31-2024
(03-14-2020, 02:08 AM)miso Wrote: I'd say YARA and C++ are the hardest to reverse-engineer, but it is still possible, it just takes a lot of timeBut why YARA? If i'm not mistaken, YARA rules are simply .yar scripts i.e. can be opened in a text editor. Is there any need to reverse them?
RE: Which programming language is hard to reverse engineering? - blitz_line - 05-01-2024
(01-10-2024, 11:37 PM)OverEzExploit Wrote: C++ is probably the hardest one, but it is subjective
agree
