Sinisterly
Leak Undetectable_US Bank_Phishing Page - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Website & Server Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Website-Server-Hacking)
+--- Thread: Leak Undetectable_US Bank_Phishing Page (/Thread-Leak-Undetectable-US-Bank-Phishing-Page)

Pages: 1 2


RE: Undetectable_US Bank_Phishing Page - Bowson - 06-03-2019

(06-03-2019, 05:10 AM)Drako Wrote:
(06-03-2019, 04:59 AM)mothered Wrote:
(06-02-2019, 08:42 PM)slothic Wrote: Hope you realize I was being sarcastic.

No you weren't.

I'm now confused. Can pages be detected as phishing or not?

@mothered correct me if im wrong,

@mothered is saying @slothic wasn't being sarcastic. He said this out of lying.
Nothing to do with pages being detected.


RE: Undetectable_US Bank_Phishing Page - slothic - 06-03-2019

(06-03-2019, 04:59 AM)mothered Wrote:
(06-02-2019, 08:42 PM)slothic Wrote:
(06-02-2019, 05:16 PM)Sh1tHappens Wrote: Firefox f. e. can detect some phising pages, if they are using a common public code for the phising page. But I think the most phising pages are FUD or you just have to change some code to get it FUD.
For me is evilginx2 the best phising tool at the moment.

(06-02-2019, 06:15 PM)Drako Wrote: I agree 100%. I've tried out evilginx, and it's really good. The demonstration is really good, and explains how it's used. I'd use it unless you can find an undetected page.

Hope you realize I was being sarcastic.

No you weren't.

Yeah I was, also phishing pages are blocked by browser through the url not source code and he uploaded source code and I put Wink to make it seem more sarcastic if ya don't catch on.


RE: Undetectable_US Bank_Phishing Page - mothered - 06-03-2019

(06-03-2019, 11:00 AM)slothic Wrote:
(06-03-2019, 04:59 AM)mothered Wrote:
(06-02-2019, 08:42 PM)slothic Wrote: Hope you realize I was being sarcastic.

No you weren't.

also phishing pages are blocked by browser through the url

Hence the necessity of "being undetected".

A detection Is exactly that, Irrespective of the entity responsible.


RE: Undetectable_US Bank_Phishing Page - emperortz - 06-03-2019

(06-03-2019, 11:57 AM)mothered Wrote:
(06-03-2019, 11:00 AM)slothic Wrote:
(06-03-2019, 04:59 AM)mothered Wrote: No you weren't.

also phishing pages are blocked by browser through the url

Hence the necessity of "being undetected".

A detection Is exactly that, Irrespective of the entity responsible.

As far as I know, fresh / new scripts created cannot be detected by Firefox or tools ..
Which can be detected when it's been reported phishing.

To not quickly red flag and detect phishing, I usually use redirect Url and Godaddy (x.co) shortlink


RE: Undetectable_US Bank_Phishing Page - Sh1tHappens - 06-03-2019

Here is a statement from mozilla: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-does-phishing-and-malware-protection-work

You see, firefox is looking in the source code and the url.


RE: Undetectable_US Bank_Phishing Page - mothered - 06-04-2019

(06-03-2019, 12:26 PM)emperortz Wrote:
(06-03-2019, 11:57 AM)mothered Wrote:
(06-03-2019, 11:00 AM)slothic Wrote: also phishing pages are blocked by browser through the url

Hence the necessity of "being undetected".

A detection Is exactly that, Irrespective of the entity responsible.

As far as I know, fresh / new scripts created cannot be detected by Firefox or tools ..

Agree.

It's based on a similar principle when FUDing files- they're Initially not detected, however eventually will be when distributed.