Sinisterly
Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Hacking Tools (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking-Tools)
+--- Thread: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. (/Thread-Dox-Tool-by-fraggout23)

Pages: 1 2


Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - glitch956 - 04-09-2018

ss:
https://imgur.com/a/zXrZd

Link:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/social-enginerring-dox-tool/?source=typ_redirect


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - Zac. - 04-10-2018

screenshot link not working


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - mothered - 04-10-2018

(04-10-2018, 08:47 AM)yeahmate[] Wrote: screenshot link not working

It's fine on my end.

At any rate, I've re-upped It here.


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - THE_G - 04-10-2018

seems good yea thanks for sharing


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - Synthx - 04-10-2018

Has 2 detections. I'd still run in a VM or sandbox
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/f3f3ab4c190dc32f78e9ad5748df042764db19197aa374fd9e1dcb3bdfc73298/detection


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - reGEN - 04-10-2018

Looks clean, nothing suspicious. Seems to have some minor formatting errors and a potential bug that is caused by assuming that the .dat file is viewable by a default program.

(04-10-2018, 02:25 PM)Synthx Wrote: Has 2 detections. I'd still run in a VM or sandbox
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/f3f3ab4c190dc32f78e9ad5748df042764db19197aa374fd9e1dcb3bdfc73298/detection

Seems like your file is different from my scan's. Detections might be false positives due to it having high entropy from the compression (assumed from smaller size). Did you upload the .zip file to VT?

SEDt.exe (SHA-256: a84ff210b9be015e6e3f8f6230394ab62d340ffba82309de9b2feb40f76017fd)
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/a84ff210b9be015e6e3f8f6230394ab62d340ffba82309de9b2feb40f76017fd/detection (0/67)


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - Synthx - 04-10-2018

(04-10-2018, 02:51 PM)reGEN Wrote: Looks clean, nothing suspicious. Seems to have some minor formatting errors and a potential bug that is caused by assuming that the .dat file is viewable by a default program.

(04-10-2018, 02:25 PM)Synthx Wrote: Has 2 detections. I'd still run in a VM or sandbox
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/f3f3ab4c190dc32f78e9ad5748df042764db19197aa374fd9e1dcb3bdfc73298/detection

Seems like your file is different from my scan's. Detections might be false positives due to it having high entropy from the compression (assumed from smaller size). Did you upload the .zip file to VT?

SEDt.exe (SHA-256: a84ff210b9be015e6e3f8f6230394ab62d340ffba82309de9b2feb40f76017fd)
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/a84ff210b9be015e6e3f8f6230394ab62d340ffba82309de9b2feb40f76017fd/detection (0/67)

No, the zip doesn't really matter. Where did you download the file from?


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - reGEN - 04-10-2018

(04-10-2018, 03:13 PM)Synthx Wrote: No, the zip doesn't really matter. Where did you download the file from?

What do you mean where did I download the file from? There's only one place where the download was provided? Unless OP swapped out the files or something. Anyway, how do you know if the zip matters or not?


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - Synthx - 04-10-2018

(04-10-2018, 04:36 PM)reGEN Wrote:
(04-10-2018, 03:13 PM)Synthx Wrote: No, the zip doesn't really matter. Where did you download the file from?

What do you mean where did I download the file from? There's only one place where the download was provided? Unless OP swapped out the files or something. Anyway, how do you know if the zip matters or not?

Honestly, idek anymore.


RE: Dox-Tool by: fraggout23. - Bish0pQ - 04-10-2018

Seems interesting, will check this out. You can never have enough tools. Also, you can embed images in the thread. You can click the image tag and embed images through url WITH extension (http://example.com/example.jpg).