(11-19-2015, 03:52 PM)Captin_Lulzboat Wrote: Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

(11-19-2015, 03:55 PM)Sin Wrote:

(11-19-2015, 03:52 PM)Captin_Lulzboat Wrote: Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

All states have to accept them, our foreign policy is that anyone that complies with any immigration laws can get in, with the proper screening. You're all worried that we'll get fucked, but you gotta remember that we actually have pretty strict immigration laws. I don't necessarily agree with this choice, especially after France, but I do believe not every single refugee is looking to fuck us in the ass. Also, I believe even if there were attempts made to harm certain structures here in the US, they would mostly be stamped out as we are a lot less lenient on warnings, especially after incidents world wide, as well as after we've suffered so many attacks due to ignorance to warnings.

(11-19-2015, 04:05 PM)Captin_Lulzboat Wrote:

(11-19-2015, 03:55 PM)Sin Wrote:

(11-19-2015, 03:52 PM)Captin_Lulzboat Wrote: Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

All states have to accept them, our foreign policy is that anyone that complies with any immigration laws can get in, with the proper screening. You're all worried that we'll get fucked, but you gotta remember that we actually have pretty strict immigration laws. I don't necessarily agree with this choice, especially after France, but I do believe not every single refugee is looking to fuck us in the ass. Also, I believe even if there were attempts made to harm certain structures here in the US, they would mostly be stamped out as we are a lot less lenient on warnings, especially after incidents world wide, as well as after we've suffered so many attacks due to ignorance to warnings.

I no all of them are not dangerous. A lot of us no that. But having the potential 1 out of every 10 people we take in could be. Why take the chance? Were basically at war and taking in people that can easily pose as a refugee. They have already been caught in turkey and other places. It will happen here. And it history shows that our TSA sucks and people get through..

(11-19-2015, 04:09 PM)Sin Wrote:

(11-19-2015, 04:05 PM)Captin_Lulzboat Wrote:

(11-19-2015, 03:55 PM)Sin Wrote:

(11-19-2015, 03:52 PM)Captin_Lulzboat Wrote: Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

All states have to accept them, our foreign policy is that anyone that complies with any immigration laws can get in, with the proper screening. You're all worried that we'll get fucked, but you gotta remember that we actually have pretty strict immigration laws. I don't necessarily agree with this choice, especially after France, but I do believe not every single refugee is looking to fuck us in the ass. Also, I believe even if there were attempts made to harm certain structures here in the US, they would mostly be stamped out as we are a lot less lenient on warnings, especially after incidents world wide, as well as after we've suffered so many attacks due to ignorance to warnings.

I no all of them are not dangerous. A lot of us no that. But having the potential 1 out of every 10 people we take in could be. Why take the chance? Were basically at war and taking in people that can easily pose as a refugee. They have already been caught in turkey and other places. It will happen here. And it history shows that our TSA sucks and people get through..

At that point what better are we then North Korea? Shutting the border and basically saying "nobody allowed" while we attack other countries? 
Or would you like to be racist and not allow just Syrian's / Muslims? you're thinking out of panic, which is what IS wants.

(11-19-2015, 04:44 PM)Buildoman Wrote: I'm not racist, but I don't want my town flooded with people suddenly.