+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: Announcements (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Announcements)
+---- Forum: Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Suggestions)
+----- Forum: Old Suggestions (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Old-Suggestions)
+----- Thread: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! (/Thread-WE-NEED-AN-ASM-SUBFORUM)
WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - superMAUS - 04-30-2014
Yah, thats what we need! If possible different subsubforums for architectures. Asm is a very important part of hacking and it is lovely to look at.
We need it!
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - misnar - 04-30-2014
Too bad only a few people here know anything about it.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Adorapuff - 04-30-2014
This is actually a really good idea. ASM is absolutely necessary for advanced exploitation.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Dyme - 04-30-2014
(04-30-2014, 05:37 PM)Adorapuff Wrote: This is actually a really good idea. ASM is absolutely necessary for advanced exploitation.
What kinds of "advanced exploitation" are we talking about here. I can't really think of anything much more outside of memory corruption in terms of vulnerability exploitation.
And idk if we really need a whole subforum for something that will most likely not be very active.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Adorapuff - 04-30-2014
(04-30-2014, 06:01 PM)Dyme Wrote: What kinds of "advanced exploitation" are we talking about here. I can't really think of anything much more outside of memory corruption in terms of vulnerability exploitation.
And idk if we really need a whole subforum for something that will most likely not be very active.
For kernel exploitation, reverse engineering, understanding buffer overflows on a technical level.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - cr33pyguy - 04-30-2014
It would be important, but I'm afraid it wouldn't stay active enough to be necessary.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Satan - 04-30-2014
We need more activity relating to specifically it before it can really get its own dedicated subforum imo
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Alan Turing - 05-01-2014
I already requested this, and @Oni denied it, because he doesn't think there would be much post activity
(04-30-2014, 06:13 PM)Adorapuff Wrote: For kernel exploitation, reverse engineering, understanding buffer overflows on a technical level.
For reverse engineering make a reverse engineering section. There's tons of buffer overflow tutorials on the net, we don't need them to be regurgitated here unless there's some unique methods for bypassing things like ASLR or other precautions.
I'd love to see an Assembly section(AT&T, Intel I don't care, legit anything is fine) but I think the problem is, and I agree with @misnar on this, is that it seems like not too many people actually understand Assembly enough, to keep the section active.
I'd love to see some more low level stuff(since that's what i'm interested in) but it seems like no one cares about that, or just doesn't want to post anything.
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - xornull - 05-01-2014
The coding section itself is inactive as hell, and I doubt many would know assembly.
But hey why not assembly rulez
RE: WE NEED AN ASM SUBFORUM!!!!! - Equinox - 05-01-2014
(05-01-2014, 04:59 AM)xornull Wrote: The coding section itself is inactive as hell, and I doubt many would know assembly.
>The coding section itself is inactive as hell
That's because I practically stole the Python section and have decided to wait until more people post.
>I doubt many would know assembly.
Do you know what website you're on right now?