Sinisterly

Full Version: Move Hustlers Threads/Posts?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
If you haven't seen the following thread, read it:
https://sinister.ly/Thread-Status-Removal-of-Hustlers

After @Silence mentioned that we archived the group's section, I'm considering moving applicable threads/posts from the subforum to their respective sections (i.e. Social Engineering). Vote in the poll to decide what we do. Whether we leave them in the Archives or not doesn't matter to me. Be advised many of the methods are copy/paste, saturated, or not validated as working.
Methods weren't so qualitative in my opinion to be moved, just simple complain for product > receive refund.

Two or three were decent.
(05-03-2017, 07:16 PM)Zajbu Wrote: [ -> ]Methods weren't so qualitative in my opinion to be moved, just simple complain for product > receive refund.

Two or three were decent.

Not to mention, very little actually involved social engineering.

A lot of them were basically:
1. "Email and complain that something is wrong with product (i.e. tasted bad/broken)."
2. "Receive replacement/refund."
(05-03-2017, 07:19 PM)Oni Wrote: [ -> ]
(05-03-2017, 07:16 PM)Zajbu Wrote: [ -> ]Methods weren't so qualitative in my opinion to be moved, just simple complain for product > receive refund.

Two or three were decent.

Not to mention, very little actually involved social engineering.

A lot of them were basically:
1. "Email and complain that something is wrong with product (i.e. tasted bad/broken)."
2. "Receive replacement/refund."

Which isn't really a "method"
I have voted for Yes.
There were some nice companies that are really fun to social engineer, I've forgot their names and they had actually quite cool products so I would like to check out the companies.
I am not sure what happened between you guys, however, the threads should not be moved as they were only exclusive within the group.
(05-03-2017, 08:07 PM)Prince. Wrote: [ -> ]I am not sure what happened between you guys, however, the threads should not be moved as they were only exclusive within the group.

Correct, thank you.
(05-03-2017, 08:07 PM)Prince. Wrote: [ -> ]I am not sure what happened between you guys, however, the threads should not be moved as they were only exclusive within the group.

I agree with you, but dont get me wrong, I voted yes, as @Noob willingly broke the rule, and was forewarned, and it should be apart of the punishment.
(05-03-2017, 08:07 PM)Prince. Wrote: [ -> ]I am not sure what happened between you guys, however, the threads should not be moved as they were only exclusive within the group.

Agreed.
Member of the group here (I was auto added as soon as I joined)

Methods are mostly known anyway tbh. The only one I did not know was pavlock and its just some generic shit. I was trying a method that envolved decompiling the android app , reversing there sync process when u set a new device up and then creating a fake device linked to a account by simulating that process.

I never thought to just try saying my shit was broken. Lol.
Pages: 1 2