Sinisterly

Full Version: ╚► iBooter V2 || Cheap-AutoBuy || Layer4&7 || Dedicated Servers ◄╗
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
[Image: ibooter.png]




Power Proof:

[Image: dstat.png]

Second Power Proof:


[Image: dstat2.png]


To help us put this in your signture:
Code:
[align=center][url=http://www.iBooter.us/purchase.php][img]http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/2139/signturek.png[/img][/url][/align]
Dearly beloved Community Members,
We are gathered here today to recall the tragic events of a very similar thread -- http://www.hackcommunity.com/Thread-Chea...#pid130115 -- that met with an untimely demise after what by all current standards appears to be a failure to have (A) delivered a vouch to Bluedog, let alone any other Member or (B) the merchandise delivered wasn't worth a purple stained dingleberry.
Personally, I'm going with option A.Biggrin
(04-04-2013, 06:02 PM)Linuxephus Wrote: [ -> ]Dearly beloved Community Members,
We are gathered here today to recall the tragic events of a very similar thread -- http://www.hackcommunity.com/Thread-Chea...#pid130115 -- that met with an untimely demise after what by all current standards appears to be a failure to have (A) delivered a vouch to Bluedog, let alone any other Member or (B) the merchandise delivered wasn't worth a purple stained dingleberry.
Personally, I'm going with option A.Biggrin

What is wrong with you?
BTW I sent bluedog a PM about a vouch copy...
(04-04-2013, 08:16 PM)rotemx7 Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-04-2013, 06:02 PM)Linuxephus Wrote: [ -> ]Dearly beloved Community Members,
We are gathered here today to recall the tragic events of a very similar thread -- http://www.hackcommunity.com/Thread-Chea...#pid130115 -- that met with an untimely demise after what by all current standards appears to be a failure to have (A) delivered a vouch to Bluedog, let alone any other Member or (B) the merchandise delivered wasn't worth a purple stained dingleberry.
Personally, I'm going with option A. Biggrin

What is wrong with you?
BTW I sent bluedog a PM about a vouch copy...

What's wrong with you not being wrong with me?
Did you really now?
And how did that turn out?

I have it directly from Bluedog that No indeed you most assuredly did not send him that vouch pertaining to the link I made in concern to your previous thread numbered at 22 Posts.
Thus now we've established there to be zero wrong with me and Something wrong with you.
Such as failing to deliver upon a product because you knew that product would fail authentication which is why none replied any further about a vouch that was never sent by you.
Which in turn makes my comment in your other thread correct and my comment here regarding option A just as valid and correct.
Therefore, let me ask you instead, "What's wrong with you?"
Allow me to answer, "You've been exposed to be point blank about it." Biggrin
That's what is wrong with you not being wrong with me.
(04-04-2013, 08:27 PM)Linuxephus Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-04-2013, 08:16 PM)rotemx7 Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-04-2013, 06:02 PM)Linuxephus Wrote: [ -> ]Dearly beloved Community Members,
We are gathered here today to recall the tragic events of a very similar thread -- http://www.hackcommunity.com/Thread-Chea...#pid130115 -- that met with an untimely demise after what by all current standards appears to be a failure to have (A) delivered a vouch to Bluedog, let alone any other Member or (B) the merchandise delivered wasn't worth a purple stained dingleberry.
Personally, I'm going with option A. Biggrin

What is wrong with you?
BTW I sent bluedog a PM about a vouch copy...

What's wrong with you not being wrong with me?
Did you really now?
And how did that turn out?

I have it directly from Bluedog that No indeed you most assuredly did not send him that vouch pertaining to the link I made in concern to your previous thread numbered at 22 Posts.
Thus now we've established there to be zero wrong with me and Something wrong with you.
Such as failing to deliver upon a product because you knew that product would fail authentication which is why none replied any further about a vouch that was never sent by you.
Which in turn makes my comment in your other thread correct and my comment here regarding option A just as valid and correct.
Therefore, let me ask you instead, "What's wrong with you?"
Allow me to answer, "You've been exposed to be point blank about it." Biggrin
That's what is wrong with you not being wrong with me.

Come on... Just tell me what do you want from me.


Guys Come And Join Us!
http://www.iBooter.us || http://www.iBooter.info
iBooter is the best stresser for you.
I saw you on LF. User has a 4+ rep. Not to much, but one was from a trusted member back in time.
(04-06-2013, 12:11 AM)rotemx7 Wrote: [ -> ]Come on... Just tell me what do you want from me.


Guys Come And Join Us!
http://www.iBooter.us || http://www.iBooter.info
iBooter is the best stresser for you.

You have nothing that I want.
I am self sufficient unto myself and unto the Community itself.
What you should want for yourself however is a good dose of honesty.
Your failure to be honest in your other thread is the reason it was Closed.
Hence the lesson you should learn here is not to be deceiving other Members here by failing to provide Vouches that you are obligated to provide by your own choice in having stated that you would.
The fact that you didn't means you wish for something to remain hidden.
Were it other Staff, you more than likely would be Banned on the spot after finding out Bluedog received no Vouch that you stated you would send, that you didn't send, then furthermore you stated you did send it, though you didn't.
You will not be permitted to in this Community to randomly act upon improper etiquette such as that.
Let this serve as a first and last verbal warning for future reference before you think of acting in such manner again.
Next time, your right to be here will be removed.
Now, behave, welcome to the Community, and carry on accordingly.
Yes?
Yes.

P.S.-If asked for a Vouch, you will provide one for a trusted Member to authenticate what you are seeking to sell, ecteteral.

Carry on good fellow.:thumbs:

(04-06-2013, 12:22 AM)ILoveYou Wrote: [ -> ]I saw you on LF. User has a 4+ rep. Not to much, but one was from a trusted member back in time.

Then this User should already know better than that kind of nonsense to begin with when it come to being told he'll only progress in this Community by selling "items" after having said "items" validated.
Which in turn leaves him even less excuse.
Thanks for the information Drake8.:wub:
(04-06-2013, 12:25 AM)Linuxephus Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-06-2013, 12:11 AM)rotemx7 Wrote: [ -> ]Come on... Just tell me what do you want from me.


Guys Come And Join Us!
http://www.iBooter.us || http://www.iBooter.info
iBooter is the best stresser for you.

You have nothing that I want.
I am self sufficient unto myself and unto the Community itself.
What you should want for yourself however is a good dose of honesty.
Your failure to be honest in your other thread is the reason it was Closed.
Hence the lesson you should learn here is not to be deceiving other Members here by failing to provide Vouches that you are obligated to provide by your own choice in having stated that you would.
The fact that you didn't means you wish for something to remain hidden.
Were it other Staff, you more than likely would be Banned on the spot after finding out Bluedog received no Vouch that you stated you would send, that you didn't send, then furthermore you stated you did send it, though you didn't.
You will not be permitted to in this Community to randomly act upon improper etiquette such as that.
Let this serve as a first and last verbal warning for future reference before you think of acting in such manner again.
Next time, your right to be here will be removed.
Now, behave, welcome to the Community, and carry on accordingly.
Yes?
Yes.

P.S.-If asked for a Vouch, you will provide one for a trusted Member to authenticate what you are seeking to sell, ecteteral.

Carry on good fellow.:thumbs:

(04-06-2013, 12:22 AM)ILoveYou Wrote: [ -> ]I saw you on LF. User has a 4+ rep. Not to much, but one was from a trusted member back in time.

Then this User should already know better than that kind of nonsense to begin with when it come to being told he'll only progress in this Community by selling "items" after having said "items" validated.
Which in turn leaves him even less excuse.
Thanks for the information Drake8.:wub:

You know what? f-u-c-k off.
I sent a PM to bluedog he didn't respond yet.
so please f-u-c-k off. I have more than 500 Customers and all of them happy and satisfied.
(04-06-2013, 02:37 AM)rotemx7 Wrote: [ -> ]You know what? f-u-c-k off.
I sent a PM to bluedog he didn't respond yet.
so please f-u-c-k off. I have more than 500 Customers and all of them happy and satisfied.

You know what?
It's extremely difficult for me to "f-u-c-k off" when currently I'm too busy "f-u-c-k-i-n-g you off" with 500 customers that you don't have and never have had.
Logic dictates if you had 500 customers dumb enough to purchase anything from your Sewage Sucking, Urine Infested Feeble Mind, this would be the last place you would currently be present whilst having your Candy Ass handed to you for so stupidly thinking that your ignorance could make me feel insulted even for the slightest second which truth be told is quite amusing to say the least.
Not to mention, you were given fair warning.
And no war of words from your feeble mind will ever stand on the same level with the individual who defines The War Of Words.
That being stated, hence forth when you log into here each time and suddenly realize your own ignorance, of your own choice, removed your right to be here, you'll think twice before peddling your ignorance elsewhere.

Thread marked for Closing after User chose to personally have his own right to be here revoked.