scanning 09-08-2015, 02:52 PM
#1
Any good scanning server providers? OVH finally gave me the boot today, Ecatel is just hell on wheels now a days, Colocrossing too expensive to bother with.
| scanning filter_list | |
![[+]](https://sinister.ly/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)
RE: scanning 09-08-2015, 03:57 PM
#4
(09-08-2015, 03:40 PM)FireStorm Wrote: Talking servers, not tools. I have my own scanning tools I wrote.
Then you should already know Nmap to be a server sided scanning auditing tool for a large number of items, servers included. Which I assumed to be the case based upon your opening statement within the thread you authored here.
RE: scanning 09-08-2015, 08:02 PM
#5
When I used to mass pwn I would just use a few servers that I compromised to do more scanning. At one point I did have some Colocrossing boxes that I was using for a good couple months before I lost access.
RE: scanning 09-08-2015, 08:23 PM
#6
(09-08-2015, 08:02 PM)Dyme Wrote: When I used to mass pwn I would just use a few servers that I compromised to do more scanning. At one point I did have some Colocrossing boxes that I was using for a good couple months before I lost access.
yeah, colo is decent for scanning I hear, but r/l, etc. it's stupid. I was thinking about WS in NL or SL in AUS.
RE: scanning 09-15-2015, 09:30 AM
#7
(09-08-2015, 03:40 PM)FireStorm Wrote: Talking servers, not tools. I have my own scanning tools I wrote.
If you wrote your own special scanning tools that you think mentioning means shit cause implying its better than public shit like mass scan then you shouldn't need to ask where/who to use for scanning f4g
whoami
RE: scanning 09-15-2015, 01:16 PM
#8
(09-15-2015, 09:30 AM)blackhatcat Wrote: If you wrote your own special scanning tools that you think mentioning means shit cause implying its better than public shit like mass scan then you shouldn't need to ask where/who to use for scanning f4g
lmao.
I mentioned it because /s/he said a tool, asked for server providers not tools. I already got 3 new providers though and scanning lists so it don't matter this thread.
RE: scanning 09-15-2015, 01:19 PM
#9
(09-08-2015, 03:57 PM)Linuxephus Wrote: Then you should already know Nmap to be a server sided scanning auditing tool for a large number of items, servers included. Which I assumed to be the case based upon your opening statement within the thread you authored here.
Does nmap have a client side? I'm not aware of nmap having a client/server relationship. As far as I know it's just simply a stand alone tool.
At any rate it sounds like the OP here is looking for actual web host servers to run software on.
---
Click here to get started with Linux!
If I helped you, please +rep me, apparently we've started over on Rep and I'd like to break 100 again...
Click here to get started with Linux!
If I helped you, please +rep me, apparently we've started over on Rep and I'd like to break 100 again...
Inori Wrote: got clickbaited by roger
RE: scanning 09-27-2015, 04:18 AM
#10
(09-15-2015, 01:19 PM)roger_smith Wrote: Does nmap have a client side? I'm not aware of nmap having a client/server relationship. As far as I know it's just simply a stand alone tool.
At any rate it sounds like the OP here is looking for actual web host servers to run software on.
Perhaps I should've been more clear in what manner I had made the original statement: "Server side" in my above referenced comment was to be understood as, "Nmap is also a scanning tool widely available for scanning servers for auditing and such."
Nonetheless, applying my use of the word from a Linux perspective, I can understand why the misunderstanding took place.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)