Login Register






Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


ps3 emulation filter_list
Author
Message
ps3 emulation #1


now this is the new beta version thats suppose to release.....



many says this one works Sad who knows?
probably works but for that u need the game cd.....

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #2
One word. This is impossible.
Second word. Fake.

PS3 maybe hacked now, but CELL processor is still a beast, do not expect anything working for at least 1-2 years (especially from YouTube guys).
[Image: rytwG00.png]
Redcat Revolution!

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #3
yeah i kind of think os.........but actually there is not just one or two videos...probably over 50........most of the gmaeplays run damn slow......secondly itt was 1 year back when this was told fake........and people stopped downloading ti....for some reason at this moment no one is calling these videos fake anymore..........so i wont say its fake without actually trying them.......

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #4
Look man, I don't know if you can understand this easily but this is really impossible. Sage and me had been part of one of the greatest Emulation forums of its time, and we have talked with real PCSX2 developers. Who can program faster than those guys on the videos can type their comments. And they have said that it is currently impossible.

Why is it so?
Cell processor is just way too strong.
According to an average calculation to calculate required specs for emulation, you need 10x more raw processing power than the console you are trying to emulate. Which does not exist yet.
True multicore programming is not yet achieved by many apps even now, so that decrease the chances even more even by using a 100 core nehalem processor.

I'm saying 1-2 years, and that is like giving hope. If you ask the real devs they would say that they are not interested. Why? Because it's a lot tougher now, and doesn't makes any sense considering how much power you would need.

Spoiler: CELL specifications:
PlayStation 3 Specifications and Details

Product name: PLAYSTATION 3

CPU: Cell Processor

PowerPC-base Core @3.2GHz
1 VMX vector unit per core
512KB L2 cache
7 x SPE @3.2GHz
7 x 128b 128 SIMD GPRs
7 x 256KB SRAM for SPE
* 1 of 8 SPEs reserved for redundancy total floating point performance: 218 GFLOPS

GPU: RSX @550MHz

1.8 TFLOPS floating point performance
Full HD (up to 1080p) x 2 channels
Multi-way programmable parallel floating point shader pipelines

Sound: Dolby 5.1ch, DTS, LPCM, etc. (Cell-base processing)

Memory:

256MB XDR Main RAM @3.2GHz
256MB GDDR3 VRAM @700MHz
[Image: rytwG00.png]
Redcat Revolution!

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #5
oooo...Biggrin now i get it........so if u want u can delete this thread..its a waste..........

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #6
I'm just trying to say "don't try fake ps3 emus from youtube because they are 100% malwares in disguise" in a different way. :lp:
[Image: rytwG00.png]
Redcat Revolution!

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #7
o_________________o ...i am not downloading any more..if there is anything i will download it is PSTE ...one year or more left for it to release......... Tongue ...wht is the problem in trying...........

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #8
(01-22-2011, 01:33 PM)shadow hunter Wrote: if there is anything i will download it is PSTE ...one year or more left for it to release......... Tongue ...wht is the problem in trying...........

You still don't get it. :lp:
Software/Hardware/Network Emulation is TEH one of the toughest level of programming. and those illeterate YouTubers CANNOT achieve even a splash screen. That is just a timer + progressbar + listbox in a form.

I won't stop you, you are free to do anything you want. But I can make more convincing than that in less than 10 minutes.
[Image: rytwG00.png]
Redcat Revolution!

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #9
ok ok...i do get it that it is the toughest programming one can think of...i wont try it dont worry...i was just saying anyway shall i change the topic name to fake objects????

Reply

RE: ps3 emulation #10
That's awesome, hope to see something like this working soon.

Reply







Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)