RE: Woman faces fines of $250/Day for “Obscene” Anti-Biden Sign’s 07-23-2021, 10:31 AM
#5
(07-23-2021, 07:48 AM)Boudica Wrote: Well, the item itself is on the boundary line of her property. It impacts land beyond her property though.It's purely displaying a message, so there's no direct Impact (externally) when It's within the confines of her property. If people don't like It, simply look away.
I honestly dislike my neighbor's banner of his favorite football team (Real Madrid CF) on his back fence, but I can't force him to remove It so as with the above scenario, I choose to Ignore It.
(07-23-2021, 07:48 AM)Boudica Wrote: It'd be like owning a sprinkler in your garden that drowns your neighbours flowerbed. Sure, the sprinkler itself itself is in their garden, but I suspect a legal argument can be made xDI absolutely agree, for the fact that the sprinkler has a direct physical Impact on the neighbor's property, as opposed to being Isolated to Its owner's premises.
![[Image: AD83g1A.png]](http://i.imgur.com/AD83g1A.png)