Login Register
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.4] (PR0J3CT PUPP3TS) filter_list
Author
Message
WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.4] (PR0J3CT PUPP3TS) #1
[Image: wintrscreen.PNG]
WinTr (PR0J3CT PUPP3TS)
Features:
  • Bombs at the speed you choose
  • Alows for randomization of from line, subject, and message
  • SMTP autodetects for yahoo and gmail, and allows custom SMTP servers
  • Alows setting the time of the attack, so you can set it up and leave so you won't get blamed!
  • Dark and simple GUI for ease of use and for your eyes
  • Alows it to be set to always on top and alows you to select opacty, so you can always watch the send count
  • Tells you a count of messages that most likely failed
  • Alows you to select from popular carrier to bomb and has a button to go to whitepages reverse phone lookup
  • Alows a send limit so you don't do too many
  • Shows some of my favorite lyrics from "Puppets (The First Snow)" by Motionless In White
  • Now shows the number of emails sent for sure, but also lets you see attempted and failed messages

I hope you enjoy WinTr. And it no longer steals the email of the person using it! Check with wireshark if you don't believe me Tongue

DOWNLOAD LINK: http://www.succubustorrents.net/WinTr.rar
SCAN: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/79685...369156972/
RAR PASSWORD: SuccubusTorrents.Net

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.3] #2
You're supposed to post virus scans with exe files.

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.3] #3
The GUI hurts my eyes. Good look with further development. Also, Kurito, it's an Email Bomber, it's going to show as a virus. I'd be more scared if it didn't.
[Image: F4Z9Dqw.png]

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.3] #4
What did you write this in? Also, 2nd on the virus scan, and why not rar it?

Cheers,
[Image: AueBtJE.png]

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.3] #5
(05-17-2013, 10:08 PM)Foulplay Wrote: What did you write this in? Also, 2nd on the virus scan, and why not rar it?

Cheers,

VB 2008.

If you are worried about a virus, sandbox it. or dissasemble it, its just .net...
Why didn't I rar it? No need to. It's on my server.
On avast it sometimes auto sandboxes it to analyze, and finds nothing suspicious.
I'll upload it somewhere for a scan though I guess, vrustotal should work since theres nothic to detect anyway.

(05-17-2013, 10:04 PM)Entity Wrote: The GUI hurts my eyes. Good look with further development. Also, Kurito, it's an Email Bomber, it's going to show as a virus. I'd be more scared if it didn't.

What can I do to make the GUI easier on your eyes? I want it dark, as a lot of people spend a lot of time in the dark on the computer.
(This post was last modified: 05-17-2013, 10:24 PM by ErroraBorealis.)

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.3] #6
Anyone have any ideas for additional features/better GUI?

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.3] #7
Recommended* you misspelled it in the program, might want to fix that.

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.3] #8
It needs a better gui, then it would be good.
[Image: GiXvY27.png]

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.3] #9
(05-20-2013, 03:20 AM)SQLi Wrote: Recommended* you misspelled it in the program, might want to fix that.
Probably me typing too fast or falling asleep with my keyboard on my bed. I'll look at that.
(05-20-2013, 03:26 AM)Sapientia Wrote: It needs a better gui, then it would be good.
I'll be working on that. I had a fancy GUI, but it was complicated to add new features and had way too much red.

Also, note to self: Add definite sent count, add tickbox for cell phone and select carrier by dropdown. Remove menu that comes from the side as it will be unneeded. Make sure other email providers are supported for sure, add update check button.

Reply

RE: WinTr E-Mail Bomber [Version 1.4] (PR0J3CT PUPP3TS) #10
First post updated, new features added, and put into a RAR. Will update the virus scan link.

Reply







Users browsing this thread: