Login Register


Undecided The SE section filter_list
Author
Message
RE: The SE section #11
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote: I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)
This is a nice idea, although I too don't know about its feasibility
Everything I post here is fictional. Anything mentioned on my posts that corresponds to events that happened in real life is coincidental.

[+] 2 users Like Ordnael92's post

RE: The SE section #12
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323  @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here
[Image: 47bd2a5d5c36e9033e4379fe45b7da1c.png]
Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?
I think registering to view is a must, would improve privacy too as mentioned by others. Doesn't take more than 5 mins to register. Definitely against the comment to view feature, that has never made sense to me.

[+] 1 user Likes WLT17's post

RE: The SE section #13
(08-27-2022, 11:25 AM)WLT17 Wrote: Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.
He spammed approximately 15 threads In the Introductions forum, not knowing It didn't add to his post count.

He also grave dug a few threads.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

[+] 4 users Like mothered's post

RE: The SE section #14
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323  @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here
[Image: 47bd2a5d5c36e9033e4379fe45b7da1c.png]
Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)
I agree with this Canadian

(08-27-2022, 01:57 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323  @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here
[Image: 47bd2a5d5c36e9033e4379fe45b7da1c.png]
Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)
I agree with this Canadian
@Canadian Moose
(This post was last modified: 08-27-2022, 01:57 PM by stealthysnake88.)

[+] 2 users Like stealthysnake88's post

RE: The SE section #15
(08-27-2022, 12:18 PM)mothered Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 11:25 AM)WLT17 Wrote: Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.
He spammed approximately 15 threads In the Introductions forum, not knowing It didn't add to his post count.

He also grave dug a few threads.
Hopefully he got what he came for before the banhammer xD
Spoiler:
[Image: rsz-rufdq6b.png]

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Generally with our forum, I figured this went without saying. However, recent discussion has led me to believe otherwise. People are encouraged to read and follow our rules, especially those regarding illegal content. You have been warned - @Oni


RE: The SE section #16
(08-27-2022, 03:52 PM)Canadian Moose Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 12:18 PM)mothered Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 11:25 AM)WLT17 Wrote: Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.
He spammed approximately 15 threads In the Introductions forum, not knowing It didn't add to his post count.

He also grave dug a few threads.
Hopefully he got what he came for before the banhammer  xD
He chose the behaviour, he chose the consequences.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

[+] 1 user Likes mothered's post

RE: The SE section #17
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323  @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here
[Image: 47bd2a5d5c36e9033e4379fe45b7da1c.png]
Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)

Yh the only problem with this is that If someone left it idle or something.

I’m all for the moves. It’s too much random and repetitive shit and some ppl don’t contribute enough to just be getting the info. Some info shared here is too hard for meady ppl to get 😂😂
Hope This Helps

UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS...

[+] 1 user Likes stevenadams2323's post

RE: The SE section #18
(08-28-2022, 02:43 AM)stevenadams2323 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:04 AM)Canadian Moose Wrote: @fractalmind0 @WLT17 @"djduderizx" @Dyne @stevenadams2323  @Ordnael92 @Kaz @LawDogUSA Share some thoughts if you have a min.

I'm not advocating that we put a 25post restriction and bring this here
[Image: 47bd2a5d5c36e9033e4379fe45b7da1c.png]
Surprisingly some of those 25 posts he quickly put in to get to the NSFW section were not all bad.

Edit: To reiterate: My main concern with the SE section is although saturation is inevitable, if it can be slowed down even just a little bit, why not?

I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)

Yh the only problem with this is that If someone left it idle or something.

I’m all for the moves. It’s too much random and repetitive shit and some ppl don’t contribute enough to just be getting the info. Some info shared here is too hard for meady ppl to get 😂😂

Yeah, that's why I suggested to also implement an option to auto-disconnect after 30 or 60 minutes of inactivity on the website haha.

But I understand the logistics and feasibility of this solution could be an issue.

[+] 2 users Like fractalmind0's post

RE: The SE section #19
(08-28-2022, 03:37 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote:
(08-28-2022, 02:43 AM)stevenadams2323 Wrote:
(08-27-2022, 02:48 AM)fractalmind0 Wrote: I'm not sure if that is do-able, but how about changing the system to the following :

Instead of having a minimum ''post requirement'', have a minimum ''time spent on the website'' requirement. It might create more issues to take into consideration (i.e. someone leaving the website open and stay logged in. But an easy fix is to have the website disconnect you automatically if you are inactive for 60+ minutes for example.)

Yh the only problem with this is that If someone left it idle or something.

I’m all for the moves. It’s too much random and repetitive shit and some ppl don’t contribute enough to just be getting the info. Some info shared here is too hard for meady ppl to get 😂😂

Yeah, that's why I suggested to also implement an option to auto-disconnect after 30 or 60 minutes of inactivity on the website haha.

But I understand the logistics and feasibility of this solution could be an issue.
thinks there's already a timer

[+] 1 user Likes Andrea Bags's post

RE: The SE section #20
IMO, and I haven't been here that long, there should be a bare minimum requirement of registering to view the forum.
It ensures at least minimal commitment of userbase. It can still be indexed with SEO bots and crawl bots.

I doubt it will help much in regards to leaking, but it may improve engagement under CRM.
Forum has a beautiful design, some things like the upgrade system should be in a BTCPay server / automatic system
But free to register.

With the forum activity in general across many competing forums here being so low, bare level commitment seems to have worked for the more active ones.
[Image: Black-Heart.png]
Immortality is subjective.

[+] 1 user Likes Dyne's post







Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)