Login Register






The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Thread Closed 


Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a filter_list
Author
Message
RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #31
I never said that was the only thing that counted. However, this wasn't meant as a real project, because if you would have read, I said I completed this in 2 hours. So of course it's not going to be perfect, even at the way it is right now. Not everything is such a huge project where every little detail has to be inspected, so don't act like it Smile
Plus, I knew of closing the object. I simply did not do it. You're acting as if I'm an idiot for not doing it an it was the completely wrong thing to do.

I set my versions as random stuff, this is actually my first project ever where I indictaed a letter to show Alpha, Beta, etc. But it still means nothing. I'll write the vesion as anything whether I plan to update or not. You're in the whole mindset of EVERYTHING HAS to be PERFECT otherwise it's just wrong and should never even be thought of let alone released. Don't be so anal, and chill out, yeah?
[Image: BAvhP6h.png]
Code:
[5:42:25 PM] i0xillusi0n: Breshie don't bust a nut over chloe now
[5:42:31 PM] Entity: fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
[5:42:33 PM] Jigglypuff | SL: EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #32
Quote:because if you would have read, I said I completed this in 2 hours.

So if I make a project in 2 hours that excuses me from receiving feedback and advice? You are trying to debate semantics here over reasoning. Who cares if your project is perfect or not, obviously you don't have the mindset to do anything about it to improve this, so leave my feedback as it is for the facts that I provide, so others can see for their own benefit.
-- cxS

[ Haskell/.NET/C/C++ - Software Engineer ]


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #33
No, but it does excuse you from expecting everything to be 100% perfect. Who cares? Obviously you do if you're still sitting here trying to convince me I should have done something when I didn't.
[Image: BAvhP6h.png]
Code:
[5:42:25 PM] i0xillusi0n: Breshie don't bust a nut over chloe now
[5:42:31 PM] Entity: fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
[5:42:33 PM] Jigglypuff | SL: EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #34
It took you 4 days to come up with that?

Quote:but it does excuse you from expecting everything to be 100% perfect.
And did you even read my post?

"Who cares if your project is perfect or not, obviously you don't have the mindset to do anything about it to improve this"

Can you even comprehend what I'm saying there? Because I think it clearly points out that I'm not talking about your project being perfect, I'm talking about unwillingness to make any improvements even if they don't make this project absolutely perfect, but rather, "better". I posted only 3 sentences there, and you still can't read it...

I'm saying you could update this program based on what you did not do, but you choose not to.
-- cxS

[ Haskell/.NET/C/C++ - Software Engineer ]


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #35
It took me 4 days? No, I just don't constantly check the thread like you do xD I have other things to do, all you do is sit around waiting for a new post to argue back at lmao

"I'm talking about unwillingness to make any improvements even if they don't make this project absolutely perfect, but rather, "better"."
Lol, at first you said it was feedback, now you're saying it was me not willing to update it. You're changing your story all over the place xD
I highly suggest you stay on one opinion, so what was it, feedback or your own little opinion that no one gives a shit about?

Either way, you're still expecting too much. This was made in 2 hours, when I just woke up. Of course it's not going to be perfect, even for the state it is currently even.
[Image: BAvhP6h.png]
Code:
[5:42:25 PM] i0xillusi0n: Breshie don't bust a nut over chloe now
[5:42:31 PM] Entity: fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
[5:42:33 PM] Jigglypuff | SL: EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #36
I don't need to, I get email notifications to any replies on any threads I post in by default.

It is feedback, in fact any post given to you is feedback you moron because feedback is a general term (I suggest you look this word up)... Feedback can be in the form of criticism, advice, or just miscellaneous comments on your thread.

I'm saying you're not willing to update it because you probably won't, you still haven't, and you just said that the a in the version didn't mean anything. The best you'll do is probably just look at what other .NET methods are available for you to "crack" other hashes and add them without disposing at all; creating hundreds of undisposed objects on the heap for the GC to come along and do an expensive sweep every now and then Smile. And you can't claim that these facts are just opinions. That just shows that you clearly haven't taken the time to investigate on why I am saying what I have said about disposing.

Quote:Either way, you're still expecting too much.

I guess so, if the programmer we're talking about here is you lol. Even if this was a half-assed program, it just means that released stuff from you is a joke because it's probably just a hack job for most of the things you make anyways.

And obfuscation? Based on what I have figured out from the code you have so far, what's the point? Nobody is going to leech your junky code anyways if they had any idea. And if they do, they are probably just skids that don't know any better.

That's all I have to say..
-- cxS

[ Haskell/.NET/C/C++ - Software Engineer ]


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #37
I find it hilarious that all you're trying to do is contradict anything I have to say xD

It's not feedback. Feedback is saying hey good job, but here's where you could have done something different to make it better. What you're saying is the program is horrible because I didn't close something. I also find it hilarious that you blame me for looking at others' code, when in reality I don't. So Mr. Bigshot, let's all assume you steal other people's work too. Do you? Probably not. Because from my knowledge you're an advanced coder. Just because someone like me -- who is basic -- releases a program, doesn't mean I looked at anyone's source.

Foreach.....hash.....if statement.....console writeline......YEP THATS SOMEONE ELSES SOURCE ALRIGHT!

No, this entire thing was just from me. You're too cocky to admit to yourself that other people have knowledge too. You're not the all-time God like you think you are.

You're expecting everything to be created as if it's a 5 star thousand dollar project. Open up your thoguths about how other people do stuff. Not just about your narcissistic self. Other peoplehave ways of donig things too, which you fail to realize.

It was half-assed I didn't put much work into it on-purpose. If I wanted to actually sit down and create this really big project, then I would. But no, this was just a warm-up for that day. Just woke up, made in 2 hours. Released right after the last debug. Yep, that means the program has to be flawless otherwise it's a failure no matter what it does.

If nobody is gonig to leak the code, then why complain about the obfuscation? It has no use for you because you're too advanced for what I have here, so what's it to you? Worry about yourself, not others.

That's all you have to say? Nah, watch as you come back to try and defend your little "king" title.
[Image: BAvhP6h.png]
Code:
[5:42:25 PM] i0xillusi0n: Breshie don't bust a nut over chloe now
[5:42:31 PM] Entity: fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
[5:42:33 PM] Jigglypuff | SL: EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #38
@cxS
I don't really see the point of arguing?
If he used code from another source then that's his issue, and the fact that you are spending your time to call him out just makes you look ignorant. It's seems like a waste of time and energy to me,and If anything this is just a helpfull tool for the nubs.
How about you do something productive and stop riding i0xIllusi0n's dick .


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #39
(05-07-2013, 03:34 PM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote: I find it hilarious that all you're trying to do is contradict anything I have to say xD

It's not feedback. Feedback is saying hey good job, but here's where you could have done something different to make it better. What you're saying is the program is horrible because I didn't close something. I also find it hilarious that you blame me for looking at others' code, when in reality I don't. So Mr. Bigshot, let's all assume you steal other people's work too. Do you? Probably not. Because from my knowledge you're an advanced coder. Just because someone like me -- who is basic -- releases a program, doesn't mean I looked at anyone's source.

Foreach.....hash.....if statement.....console writeline......YEP THATS SOMEONE ELSES SOURCE ALRIGHT!

No, this entire thing was just from me. You're too cocky to admit to yourself that other people have knowledge too. You're not the all-time God like you think you are.

You're expecting everything to be created as if it's a 5 star thousand dollar project. Open up your thoguths about how other people do stuff. Not just about your narcissistic self. Other peoplehave ways of donig things too, which you fail to realize.

It was half-assed I didn't put much work into it on-purpose. If I wanted to actually sit down and create this really big project, then I would. But no, this was just a warm-up for that day. Just woke up, made in 2 hours. Released right after the last debug. Yep, that means the program has to be flawless otherwise it's a failure no matter what it does.

If nobody is gonig to leak the code, then why complain about the obfuscation? It has no use for you because you're too advanced for what I have here, so what's it to you? Worry about yourself, not others.

That's all you have to say? Nah, watch as you come back to try and defend your little "king" title.

Quote:It's not feedback. Feedback is saying hey good job,

Man, you're f*ckin' stupid that's all I have to say... Did you learn any words in school, at all?

Feedback:
Quote:A reaction or response to a particular process or activity: He got very little feedback from his speech.

It's just a reaction, or response, it doesn't have to be good, it doesn't have to be bad, it doesn't have to be in the form of advice... You could have looked that up too you know? But you didn't. And obviously once again assuming that you know what it means.

Now quit avoiding what I'm really talking about here and taking the conversation on a detour... I'm on topic with disposing, and here you go again, back on topic with your code being leeched after we've already been through that. Out of all of that BS you posted, none of it was on topic with where we were in the discussion.

Glad you find it funny too, I can mock lots of what you say because you don't stay on topic, all you do is jump around in the conversation to where ever you want to take it, whether it makes sense or not. It would be like you talking about the weather one minute and then jumping off into politics the next minute out of nowhere.

... Did you not understand any of this or what? Seems like you just avoided it entirely:
"without disposing at all; creating hundreds of undisposed objects on the heap for the GC to come along and do an expensive sweep every now and then Smile. And you can't claim that these facts are just opinions. That just shows that you clearly haven't taken the time to investigate on why I am saying what I have said about disposing."

>> You're doing the same thing here as you did before, only talking about what you want to talk about and not even reading the post. Just like when I asked for proof on that last thread probably more than 10 times in a row, and you still somehow "didn't see it" in my post, or you deliberately avoided it because you had none, and admitting so, would've made you look like a fool.

(05-07-2013, 07:20 PM)Dread Wrote: @cxS
I don't really see the point of arguing?
If he used code from another source then that's his issue, and the fact that you are spending your time to call him out just makes you look ignorant. It's seems like a waste of time and energy to me,and If anything this is just a helpfull tool for the nubs.
How about you do something productive and stop riding i0xIllusi0n's dick .

Okay there nub... Then go take your party elsewhere if you think it's not worth the energy. I'm pointing out things that are valid here, and all he can do is make excuses for how it doesn't matter, and his program is perfectly fine. Use it if you want, you don't have any idea of how slow this would be either, and all because of the way the code was written. Nub tool coded by a nub programmer. Smile
-- cxS

[ Haskell/.NET/C/C++ - Software Engineer ]


RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a #40
Quote:Okay there nub... Then go take your party elsewhere if you think it's not worth the energy. I'm pointing out things that are valid here, and all he can do is make excuses for how it doesn't matter, and his program is perfectly fine. Use it if you want, you don't have any idea of how slow this would be either, and all because of the way the code was written. Nub tool coded by a nub programmer. Smile

I don't ever recall saying I was going to use the program? I'm just being inquisitive, and am wondering at where are you trying to get at with this argument? Do you just enjoy being a negative prick? I can't see one positive reason for this pointless unmindful harangue.
Does it add some intensification to your hormonal/testosterone levels.. peering through the computer screen with a encyclopedic grin on your face.
Or does it rustle your Jimmys and make you feel intellectually superior? :false sense of pride:
Because if so.. then you should either drop your pudenda or see a psychiatrist.
Choose your ultimatum... :blackhat:








Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)