[ArkPhaze]

I've designed lots of stuff in graphics, I'm also sufficient in video editing and music composition. That header isn't the best of my work though, but it works. I just wanted something more bold than a larger text in the thread.

[Deque]

which is not specific to any OS like bytecode

I believe you mixed something up here. Bytecode is not OS specific and Managed Code by .NET is also Bytecode.
Edit: In my opinion it is a good choice not to include a Java vs C# topic here.

[Psycho_Coder]

I've designed lots of stuff in graphics, I'm also sufficient in video editing and music composition. That header isn't the best of my work though, but it works. I just wanted something more bold than a larger text in the thread.

Astonishing but I have to say I am so jealous of you. How can you do a lot of things ? I mean to say you are excellent in VB, C#, C++ , python, Video editing and Ps too urprised: how its is possible for you to know all these, I mean all of these (Do you study 30 hrs a day ). I know a bit of code, a bit of video editing with Camtasia, In Ps I just know how to remove the background :lol:

I am inspired by you. I will work harder now.

[ArkPhaze]

I spend too much time on the computer based on what others tell me. I wouldn't consider myself "excellent" in C++ though, I'm only intermediate. I've been doing graphics since before I started programming though. Now it's just on and off though, as the same with my music and such. I've done a little bit of a lot of things though. You just have to enjoy learning new things and you'll go far (enough) in my opinion.

---

which is not specific to any OS like bytecode

I believe you mixed something up here. Bytecode is not OS specific and Managed Code by .NET is also Bytecode.
Edit: In my opinion it is a good choice not to include a Java vs C# topic here.

Ahh, technically a different bit of instructions of bytecode though (I wanted to try to explain it saying a "different kind of bytecode", however that might imply that bytecode comes in variations...), but I see your point; bytecode is bytecode. I did no proof reading here so I'll be fixing errors as they are mentioned. You read it wrong though however... Although, this may be an indication that I need to re-word this if you read it in that way...

What I meant by this: "not specific to any OS like bytecode," was that CIL code is not specific to any OS, just like bytecode (isn't). I was comparing the similarity of the two in that way, not showing a difference by saying bytecode was OS dependent. Sorry.

edit: I've re-worded it now, hopefully it should make more sense as per what I initially meant, but technically it should be accurate as a sentence now too.

[Deque]

I spend too much time on the computer based on what others tell me. I wouldn't consider myself "excellent" in C++ though, I'm only intermediate. I've been doing graphics since before I started programming though. Now it's just on and off though, as the same with my music and such. I've done a little bit of a lot of things though. You just have to enjoy learning new things and you'll go far (enough) in my opinion.

---

which is not specific to any OS like bytecode

I believe you mixed something up here. Bytecode is not OS specific and Managed Code by .NET is also Bytecode.
Edit: In my opinion it is a good choice not to include a Java vs C# topic here.

Ahh, technically a different bit of instructions of bytecode though (I wanted to try to explain it saying a "different kind of bytecode", however that might imply that bytecode comes in variations...), but I see your point; bytecode is bytecode. I did no proof reading here so I'll be fixing errors as they are mentioned. You read it wrong though however... Although, this may be an indication that I need to re-word this if you read it in that way...

What I meant by this: "not specific to any OS like bytecode," was that CIL code is not specific to any OS, just like bytecode (isn't). I was comparing the similarity of the two in that way, not showing a difference by saying bytecode was OS dependent. Sorry.

edit: I've re-worded it now, hopefully it should make more sense as per what I initially meant, but technically it should be accurate as a sentence now too.

*nods*
I see how you meant it. That makes sense.

[Deltex]

thank you boss.thanks a lot

[KhAlIfA]

shd i learn vb or c#?

[ArkPhaze]

shd i learn vb or c#?

You're basically asking if you should learn .NET or .NET.

[KhAlIfA]

shd i learn vb or c#?

You're basically asking if you should learn .NET or .NET.

lol i did

but brah i find vb easier to memorize any fast way to learn it?

or should i try other language?

[ArkPhaze]

shd i learn vb or c#?

You're basically asking if you should learn .NET or .NET.

lol i did

but brah i find vb easier to memorize any fast way to learn it?

or should i try other language?

You're never going to memorize a full language, so if that's your reason for learning a language, I'd choose a different reason. Deque posted a good thread on programming languages in general if you look around.