Taking the Last step on my religious journey.

3SidedSquare · 05-22-2013, 02:56 AM

I know very little about satanism, or your religious journey, but in my experience taking the "last step" is really just a first step into a higher level of that discipline.

Don't think of this as being a "last step"; it may not be.

Evangelist · 05-22-2013, 05:51 AM

(05-22-2013, 02:56 AM)3SidedSquare Wrote: I know very little about satanism, or your religious journey, but in my experience taking the "last step" is really just a first step into a higher level of that discipline.

Don't think of this as being a "last step"; it may not be.

That is actually a great point. You are right.

(05-20-2013, 03:00 PM)Dogs Toy Wrote: I don't believe in any religions, seems like a load of horseshit to me

This is more of a Philosophy than a religion. So your mediocre post has no deal here.

Customer · 05-22-2013, 06:15 AM

(05-22-2013, 12:07 AM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote: Yet you did it in such a manner that implied towards me.

If I were to say something to you, I would quote you. Like I did in the post above it. Like I do with everyone else I talk to.

Lain · 05-22-2013, 06:39 AM

(05-22-2013, 05:51 AM)Evangelist Wrote: That is actually a great point. You are right.

This is more of a Philosophy than a religion. So your mediocre post has no deal here.

Satan is part of various religions Tongue

Evangelist · 05-22-2013, 07:00 PM

(05-22-2013, 06:39 AM)Dogs Toy Wrote: Satan is part of various religions

Not in this one he isn't hes just a symbol

i0xIllusi0n · 05-22-2013, 11:17 PM

(05-22-2013, 06:15 AM)Customer Wrote: If I were to say something to you, I would quote you. Like I did in the post above it. Like I do with everyone else I talk to.

Implying that not quoting people means you're not talking to the, I've replied to threads before without clicking quote but referring to one person.
Plus the fact that you don't need to quote people when you're implying something and not directly saying so.

Customer · 05-23-2013, 03:02 AM

(05-22-2013, 11:17 PM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote: Implying that not quoting people means you're not talking to the, I've replied to threads before without clicking quote but referring to one person.
Plus the fact that you don't need to quote people when you're implying something and not directly saying so.

But that goes for only you. Quotes were made so you can reply to people. If I didn't quote you, I wasn't talking to you. That's basically the bottom line. I don't realy care for what you have done. If I didn't mean to talk to you, then I didn't.

Lain · 05-23-2013, 03:39 AM

(05-22-2013, 07:00 PM)Evangelist Wrote: Not in this one he isn't hes just a symbol

So it is a religion Tongue

i0xIllusi0n · 05-23-2013, 06:13 AM

(05-23-2013, 03:02 AM)Customer Wrote: But that goes for only you. Quotes were made so you can reply to people. If I didn't quote you, I wasn't talking to you. That's basically the bottom line. I don't realy care for what you have done. If I didn't mean to talk to you, then I didn't.

Oh really? It's funny because no you didn't speak to my directly, but you did clearly imply it.

Customer · 05-23-2013, 09:33 AM

(05-23-2013, 06:13 AM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote: Oh really? It's funny because no you didn't speak to my directly, but you did clearly imply it.

I never implied that I was speaking to you. The post above that I quoted you. The actual post that you think I said about you, I didn't quote you. What does that tell you?