[Illuminate_mybb_import19686]

Today, I pose the question for to community of RF to discuss. Should animals animals have to take the role of a subject for scientific research?

In no circumstances can we objectively state that animals have given consent to participate. I will be defending the negative light of this matter, and please take this seriously.

[Para]

In my opinion there are a lot of humans I would rather test on.

[Illuminate_mybb_import19686]

In my opinion there are a lot of humans I would rather test on.

I wholeheartedly agree.

[Mars_mybb_import13750]

In my opinion there are a lot of humans I would rather test on.

I wholeheartedly agree.

Pretty much this. Either way, I am against any animal suffering. (Not human suffering.) And those who do it just to use it as coat and waste everything else is pretty much stupid. Though, when it comes to animals hunting animals, it's the nature of the wild, to feed themselves.

I may go off-topic but no animal should really be tested, but then again we don't communicate. Sometimes it takes sacrifice to find crucial information which could then help the majority. Pretty much like one animal, can help make others aware of crucial information and save the rest, or the rest could live in whatever negative thing humans do not know about.

Humans are the most evil creatures.

[OutOfSight]

No thats mest up