[cxS]

Haha, such a child you resort to insults like that?? xD
"By your age you still haven't hit puberty" - You don't even know how old I am lmao

You're running out of things to say so you resort to childish insults in an attempt to get somewhere. Only makes you worse.
Age does not show maturity. Age shows a maturity range. Clearly you're more immature than I am since you're going to sit here and resort to kid games. You may be older, who knows, I don't because I don't know how old you are. But you still are immature compared to me and most of the forum.

Since everybody can tell you're just running out of things to say and are only talking kid-style, I'm going to leave. You're not worth my time.

Really? Just more proof that you didn't even bother reading my posts in your ignorance. http://www.anarchyforums.net/Thread-Requ...7#pid35047 This is where I linked to a post you made: http://www.anarchyforums.net/Thread-Synd...6#pid33926

AGE
I am 17 years old.

So you're just making that up then?

I'm not running out of things to say, there's a whole universe of information out there if I was to continue searching for proof on why you're wrong. You've just shown that you are too stubborn to look at any of my proof though so why should I feel the need to continue? You're not very smart you know. It was the first remark I actually made to you, and even though the majority of the rest of my posts were relevent to the issue, you bring it up like it was the thesis to what I was saying. Now how childish are you?

Age does not show maturity

It is proving to show a lack of experience and arrogance for yourself though. You're only reinforcing all the bad stereotypes others' have about the people in your age group.

The only thing you talk about here is immaturity, yet again (like every other reply you have made), nothing in relation to the proof I have provided. And you have yet to give me a reason for why all the proof I have given you is wrong. Leave the thread if you will, it's only evident to me that you're unwilling to openly admit that you are wrong. The only thing you have said to me is how "right" you are, but where is YOUR proof then? The fact that your "many many" friends say that it is invoking?

Alright then....

[i0xIllusi0n]

I know I said I was leaving, but I just have to respond xD This is too hilarious.

What I found hilarious is that you PM me trying to provoke me and play even more childish games, then when I hit reply, it says I'm on your ignore list. Looks like somebody can't take the heat without getting pissed

The entire world can tell that even though I may be younger than you, I still have a higher maturity level
"THIS KID THINKS HES COOL SO IM GONNA NEGATIVE REP HIM -- THAT'LL SHOW HIM!!!" lmao

You're entertainment, kid. Keep it coming.

[cxS]

lol, again there kid, proof that you didn't read any of what I said previously:

It's a waste of time for anyone listening to what you say for the fact that you don't give out accurate information, and also a waste of time trying to show you where that false information exists in your posts, therefore perhaps it would be better to avoid your posts altogether... And that would be my advice to anybody else.

Higher maturity level, but yet you find the littlest things amusing enough to share with everybody else? You've derailed this thread more than anybody else who has even posted here because you couldn't stay on topic of invoking, based on what OP was asking.

And so it comes full circle, just another word you don't know the definition of.

I've already had one other person agree about your ignorance btw, but I will not share his name to keep the confidentiality unless he wants me to reveal their username here.

[i0xIllusi0n]

Mature people find kids funny. So, that proves nothing. I found you funny because you think that a negative point on a forum reputation record is going to do anything xD

Also, I've derailed this thread? It takes two to have an argument, you're not such a perfect little angel either Lol.
It was invoking, you're just in denial because you feel as if you have to be right every single time. I understand I'm not right all the time, that's not the point. I'd rather trust many people than a cocky kid from the internet.

Then you still attempt to insult with kid insults. I think that's hilarious too.

[cxS]

Mature people find kids funny. So, that proves nothing. I found you funny because you think that a negative point on a forum reputation record is going to do anything xD

You seem to be very concerned about your reputation. I would wonder why that is? I never brought up reputation anywhere, nor told you what I thought of it.

Also, I've derailed this thread? It takes two to have an argument, you're not such a perfect little angel either Lol.

And only takes one to take it from a civilized discussion into something meaningless, which you have done. I gave you proof, stayed on topic, and the best you ever did was engage in a personal battle with me. And the best you had to bring to the discussion was about how you trust your friends more than solid documentation and other reputable online sources from many other experienced programmers.

It was invoking, you're just in denial because you feel as if you have to be right every single time. I understand I'm not right all the time, that's not the point. I'd rather trust many people than a cocky kid from the internet.

It is entirely the point here, because you can't even see that you are wrong even after proof is put in front of you. Do you need better reading glasses? Because surely you have not read the proof I have posted, or, are deliberately denying all of the facts that they depict. You are so oblivious to the fact that I am not the only one telling you that you are wrong, yet that seems to be the only thing you see with your narrow closed minded attitude; that you would rather believe your friends over one person, being myself.

I must represent MSDN and StackOverflow by your statement then... :rolleyes:

Tell me if I'm missing it or not, but if it's invoking as you say, after about 4 pages of posts, where is any ounce of proof to say that it is? :huh: Enlighten us...

Btw, I thought you said you were done? And yes, you are so mature there buddy, avoiding everything that you don't have a response to in my posts, and continuing on the most irrelevant parts of this entire discussion. *thumbs up to you*

[i0xIllusi0n]

I'm not wrong. It was invoking. You're in denial because you want to be right. Do i need glasses? Clearly not if I'm reading what you're typing, and responding. So there you go again with your little kid games

You are one cocky kid. "I'm right and everybody else is wrong no matter what they say." Lol the real world is going to get to you pretty soon.
And, as I said before, I did say I was done. But I said I'm coming back because I think it's funny how you're acting like such a child xD Now you're the oblivious one.

This is you in a nutshell:
"I'm right. You're wrong. No matter what. You're a kid, go hit puberty. Go get reading glasses. I'm going to negative rep you to show that I actually care about hurting you."

It's pretty funny to be honest xD

[cxS]

I'm not wrong. It was invoking. You're in denial because you want to be right. Do i need glasses? Clearly not if I'm reading what you're typing, and responding. So there you go again with your little kid games

You are one cocky kid. "I'm right and everybody else is wrong no matter what they say." Lol the real world is going to get to you pretty soon.
And, as I said before, I did say I was done. But I said I'm coming back because I think it's funny how you're acting like such a child xD

This is you in a nutshell:
"I'm right. You're wrong. No matter what. You're a kid, go hit puberty. Go get reading glasses. I'm going to negative rep you to show that I actually care about hurting you."

It's pretty funny to be honest xD

I'm not wrong. It was invoking. You're in denial....

So you keep saying, but before you provide any proof it's back to this whole "denial" speech, so I'll avoid all of the rest of the crap you've posted after that part of your sentence, as it's really irrelevant lol. And you say you're more mature than me? You don't have any idea....

You seem to read only what you want to read in my posts, yet you think that because you are responding only to the (irrelevant) parts, that you are making this anything meaningful in terms of a discussion. It could not be farther from the truth.

I'll ask for another time, (and I've now lost count of how many times I have asked,) but where is your proof exactly? :S

I asked for proof, and this is the only kind of response you've ever given:

You are one cocky kid. "I'm right and everybody else is wrong no matter what they say." Lol the real world is going to get to you pretty soon.
And, as I said before, I did say I was done. But I said I'm coming back because I think it's funny how you're acting like such a child xD

This is you in a nutshell:
"I'm right. You're wrong. No matter what. You're a kid, go hit puberty. Go get reading glasses. I'm going to negative rep you to show that I actually care about hurting you."

Maturity in it's finest is this? Perhaps only in your own eyes? Just like you seem to be confused about what Invoking really is. I am going to skip all of the nonsense, and keep on topic here because the only pieces on the board that I can see for the "game" you keep referring to, are your own lol. I'm not the one playing it here, and you're not fooling anybody else.

This time in bold:

Where's this proof to go with why you think this is what you would call "invoking"?

[i0xIllusi0n]

You don't even know the code I was using xD and you think you can tell me I have no idea what I'm talking about? Lol look at yourself.
I don't need proof. Anybody can look up some stuff and explain your side of the story. There's multiple sides to everything.

Many people who are better coders than you have told me it was invoking. I knew it was invoking. Then you come along and say it wasn't. Ok, show me your proof? Show me you even know the code I was using? Lol

This is seriously too fucking funny.

[cxS]

You don't even know the code I was using xD and you think you can tell me I have no idea what I'm talking about? Lol look at yourself.
I don't need proof. Anybody can look up some stuff and explain your side of the story. There's multiple sides to everything.

Many people who are better coders than you have told me it was invoking. I knew it was invoking. Then you come along and say it wasn't. Ok, show me your proof? Show me you even know the code I was using? Lol

This is seriously too fucking funny.

You don't even know the code I was using xD

Here we go again, the same thing I have already covered in a previous post, or have you forgotten? Perhaps you didn't read it?

Lol look at yourself.

Well, where is this proof? Or did you not see that big bold text I posted in my previous post, after all of the other times I have posted it? I'm open to any proof that you can provide, but I'm not seeing any lol. Keep talking though, your claims do not mean an ounce of truth until proof is supplied and packaged along with them.

I don't need proof. Anybody can look up some stuff and explain your side of the story. There's multiple sides to everything.

Of course, but only one correct side for what Invoking means, and you're going to say that MSDN is wrong in this case? I think your head is not right... You're definitely too "good" for having to provide any proof though right? Everybody should just assume that what you say is right? Because I don't think so.

Many people who are better coders than you have told me it was invoking.

Please list them off, John Carmack? programmers from Google? Microsoft? Apple?

I knew it was invoking. Then you come along and say it wasn't. Ok, show me your proof? Show me you even know the code I was using? Lol

You're incapable of having a discussion here because you can't even remember, or comprehend the post that you are replying to... I already went over this, a couple times now. It's just round in circles again with you though. I've shown you all the proof that you should ever need. The way you explained and used invoking in the context of your post showed that you don't know what it is, so why should I need any code of yours? Do you not have any common sense?

Funny how you have the audacity to ask me for proof though, after I've been providing it all along, and yet you haven't posted even a single piece of your own evidence though. What are you smoking? :S

I will await yet another response from you even though you said you were done a few posts ago, and one that still contains no proof that shows I am wrong. You're doing good in this discussion aren't you? lol.

[i0xIllusi0n]

Posting a link to MSDN doesn't prove anything, don't get so hyped about it. Lol.
Haha, you're so cocky. You think you're the best coder who ever lived. You're not even close. You're more of a shit coder if you ask me. (inb4 butthurt)

I'm not asking you for proof. I'm saying you're ignorant to the other side of the situation.

Answer this, why should I believe you, being the cocky little ignorant child you are, instead of many friends of mine that are better coders than you?