Seven Years of Service
Posts: 156
Threads: 44
Points: 249NSP
RE: Net neutrality 12-01-2017, 08:37 AM
#2
I've done that primo it's fun
•
Eight Years of Service
Posts: 1,150
Threads: 82
Points: 71NSP
RE: Net neutrality 12-01-2017, 02:32 PM
#3
Okay, I'm about to fucking go off. This is a bunch of bullsh*t because they don't look at the bigger picture. People nowadays are somewhat struggling to pay their bills without this fast lane shit, and bundles, I don't think they understand that this could ruin the U.S.. Plus, what about all the higher ranked people that work for those companies, they will probably just get to have as fast internet as they want without having to pay for bundles and crap..? What the hell happens to the I.T. professionals that are managing this stuff, they will probably be able to get around this. I really feel that they shouldn't be allowed to do this, they are literally only going to be doing this so they can get more f*cking money that they don't need. All I have to say is, if this goes through, and they repeal this stuff, I just hope that they all get f*cked over.
Edit: Sorry for the strong use of language.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2017, 02:34 PM by Synthx.)
Twelve Years of Service
Posts: 313
Threads: 99
Points: 116NSP
RE: Net neutrality 12-01-2017, 03:13 PM
#4
I heard that owner of Mega.co.nz is planning to launch alternative internet if net neutrality goes away. Not sure how's he gonna do that, but still, sounds great.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2017, 03:13 PM by Cyber Warrior.)
•
Seven Years of Service
Posts: 45
Threads: 2
Points: 49NSP
RE: Net neutrality 12-01-2017, 06:03 PM
#7
I support the laws that equate to net neutrality. I don't support the fear mongering and slippery slope arguments people are using. I want sites like the one you linked to educate people on what exactly is going on. It's incredibly vague and misleading to just say the FCC wants to end net neutrality without any explanation of what exactly that means.
From what I can gather, which is difficult because it seems hard to get actual factual information that isn't biased about this, Title 22 is on the line here. All of my opinions here are going to go on that presumption and disregard any of the other regulations and any kind of slippery slope argument. I support Title 22 as a consumer and as someone that hates capitalism. From the business side, it fucking sucks because bandwidth costs money and treating it all equally is a hindrance. However, repealing it is going to do NOTHING to increase competition. The ISP market is inherently flawed due to limitations on infrastructure creating pseudo-monopolies where the secondary options pale in cost to benefit ratio.
I also believe we can't stop this. 99% of arguments I see disregard what IS happening and only talk about what MIGHT happen. I don't see how that's going to convince any Congressman that what they are doing is wrong.
•