Login Register


Modifications to the Group System filter_list
Author
Message
RE: Modifications to the Group System #31
Personally, I believe the challenge was a great idea. Alex, you seem eager to say what was wrong with it without considering what went well.
It did not disgrace our group whatsoever. If it had, Oni would have stepped in already.

I shall be doing my part in the challenge soon! I will also be tagging several members once the video has been uploaded.
[Image: 4GNsK67.png]


RE: Modifications to the Group System #32
(09-09-2014, 02:24 PM)Six Wrote: Looking at the application thread, yours was reviewed. You linked threads from early last year for us to consider, and haven't had much contribution after them. Yours was declined.


A majority of what you did for the group as a leader was activity checks, so, not much room to criticise.

The activity checks where pretty successful imo. I help raise 5000 sp for the group. Kept track of threads that people made for reverence. Went through multiple applications. Made group votes for new members.

What have you done? Nothing.

Reverence hasn't even recruited new people you would think that a website with 4,985 registered members would have more than 5 members in a official group.

Not only did you not recruit new people it took you 3 weeks to invite the members you recruited in the first place. Nor, did you tell why the people got declined. ( you would think that a group that is aiming for "HQ", would at least tell the members why they didn't get accepted so they can work on what they did wrong) Yawn

(09-08-2014, 08:14 PM)Adorapuff Wrote: The price to pay was optional. Also lots of people enjoyed the challenge, and watching other SLers do it. It brought the community together. If you can't see that I'm sorry

"If you don't complete in 48 hours (not 24 because I'm nice), you must donate 1000 SP to the +Reverence fund that is used for giveaways and nominate 3 people for the challenge. For those who want to give some SP instead of doing the challenge, send please send it to
Reverence SP Reserve"


You didn't state that in your thread. The Challenge didn't bring the community together Confused.
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2014, 10:09 PM by Alex.)


Re: RE: Modifications to the Group System #33
(09-10-2014, 10:06 PM)Alex Wrote: The activity checks where pretty successful imo. I help raise 5000 sp for the group. Kept track of threads that people made for reverence. Went through multiple applications. Made group votes for new members.

What have you done? Nothing.

Reverence hasn't even recruited new people you would think that a website with 4,985 registered members would have more than 5 members in a official group.

Not only did you not recruit new people it took you 3 weeks to invite the members you recruited in the first place. Nor, did you tell why the people got declined. ( you would think that a group that is aiming for "HQ", would at least tell the members why they didn't get accepted so they can work on what they did wrong) Yawn

Actually I stated they could contact me if they wanted to know what was wrong. If they don't have interest enough in improving themselves to better their quality by sending a simple message, they don't intend to change at all.

Your activity checks did nothing. No contributions were made. Saying "post here to stay in the group" allows people who are lurking to fly by your system.

Made group votes? Really, cos I saw like, eight members come and go for being shit quality users with 0 group votes on them.

Etc etc registered members. Of those, how many are active on a daily basis? Meaning not lurking.

And yeah there was a delay. Cos we were fixing the subforum, figuring rules out and more defined, and solving little petty bullshit issues your little egotistical self brought up because you didn't like how we were running things.

Guess what, asshat?

On average we have MORE contributions.
MORE user to user help.
MORE activity.
Than reverence ever did under your leadership.

Get the fuck off your high horse little boy, you think you can do better, buy your own damn group and stop bitching about someone else's.

You aren't high quality when all you do is complain about either reverence or reputation.
Qq.
telegram: @satan_sl


RE: Modifications to the Group System #34
(09-10-2014, 10:06 PM)Alex Wrote: The activity checks where pretty successful imo. I help raise 5000 sp for the group. Kept track of threads that people made for reverence. Went through multiple applications. Made group votes for new members.

What have you done? Nothing.

Reverence hasn't even recruited new people you would think that a website with 4,985 registered members would have more than 5 members in a official group.

Not only did you not recruit new people it took you 3 weeks to invite the members you recruited in the first place. Nor, did you tell why the people got declined. ( you would think that a group that is aiming for "HQ", would at least tell the members why they didn't get accepted so they can work on what they did wrong) Yawn


"If you don't complete in 48 hours (not 24 because I'm nice), you must donate 1000 SP to the +Reverence fund that is used for giveaways and nominate 3 people for the challenge. For those who want to give some SP instead of doing the challenge, send please send it to
Reverence SP Reserve"


You didn't state that in your thread. The Challenge didn't bring the community together Confused.

Do you do anything other than bitch about how Adorapuff runs Reverence? Honestly lol. Just shut the fuck up about it, you're not owner anymore, get over it.


RE: Modifications to the Group System #35
(09-11-2014, 02:06 AM)chronical Wrote: Do you do anything other than bitch about how Adorapuff runs Reverence? Honestly lol. Just shut the fuck up about it, you're not owner anymore, get over it.

I was never owner in the first place. Vipr is still the one and only Owner. Lol.


RE: Modifications to the Group System #36
(09-11-2014, 02:20 AM)Alex Wrote: I was never owner in the first place. Vipr is still the one and only Owner. Lol.

Then I was misinformed as Adorapuff told me you were the previous owner. Either way, you never shut the fuck up about it and everyone is annoyed by it. Quit overreacting and acting like a child because you don't get your way.


RE: Modifications to the Group System #37
(09-11-2014, 02:23 AM)chronical Wrote: Then I was misinformed as Adorapuff told me you were the previous owner. Either way, you never shut the fuck up about it and everyone is annoyed by it. Quit overreacting and acting like a child because you don't get your way.

He used to be a group leader.
#MakeSinisterlySexyAgain


RE: Modifications to the Group System #38
(09-11-2014, 02:00 AM)Six Wrote: Actually I stated they could contact me if they wanted to know what was wrong. If they don't have interest enough in improving themselves to better their quality by sending a simple message, they don't intend to change at all.

Your activity checks did nothing. No contributions were made. Saying "post here to stay in the group" allows people who are lurking to fly by your system.

Made group votes? Really, cos I saw like, eight members come and go for being shit quality users with 0 group votes on them.

Etc etc registered members. Of those, how many are active on a daily basis? Meaning not lurking.

And yeah there was a delay. Cos we were fixing the subforum, figuring rules out and more defined, and solving little petty bullshit issues your little egotistical self brought up because you didn't like how we were running things.

Guess what, asshat?

On average we have MORE contributions.
MORE user to user help.
MORE activity.
Than reverence ever did under your leadership.

Get the fuck off your high horse little boy, you think you can do better, buy your own damn group and stop bitching about someone else's.

You aren't high quality when all you do is complain about either reverence or reputation.
Qq.

You still haven't told me what you have done to contribute to the group. Stop dancing around the question.

Quote:"
On average we have MORE contributions.
MORE user to user help.
MORE activity.
Than reverence ever did under your leadership.
"

Incorrect, during my time period of leading I had more thread made under the reverence name than during yours. You can say its because Reverence had more members back than but that isn't really that case. The group members had more incentive to post threads, you say that activity checks were meaningless but I'm pretty it did more good than it did bad. It kept the members checking the sub forums. Do you really think Vipr and I actually kept people who lurked? I could show you countless pms of me warning members to increase there activity (If my pm box didn't get full from the SE and E removal).




I honestly feel bad for Adorapuff, he is doing majority of the work.
In before you say you "helped" who produced the final product?
Adorapuff.

The true question is why does Reverence have three leaders?

Quote:"Made group votes? Really, cos I saw like, eight members come and go for being shit quality users with 0 group votes on them."

Who cares? At least we tried new members, if they didn't work out they were removed.

Quote:"And yeah there was a delay. Cos we were fixing the subforum, figuring rules out and more defined, and solving little petty bullshit issues your little egotistical self brought up because you didn't like how we were running things."

Fixing the subforums takes about a day max to do. You took 3 weeks.

Quote:"Actually I stated they could contact me if they wanted to know what was wrong. If they don't have interest enough in improving themselves to better their quality by sending a simple message, they don't intend to change at all."
How are they suppose to change or care to change when you don't open recruitment.

The whole point of the group is for high quality members, when you see official threads by leaders with spelling mistakes that isn't high quality that is rushed.


RE: Modifications to the Group System #39
(09-11-2014, 02:26 AM)Adorapuff Wrote: He used to be a group leader.
Ah, my mistake then.


RE: Modifications to the Group System #40
>people arguing about groups on SL
>lol

Go outside or something.








Users browsing this thread: