[Pringle]

There's an os that takes up 1.44mb of space and requires 8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb. I don't know if you've heard of it, but I don't believe this at all. I really want to setup dualboot with this now...
Link for anyone else who wants it:http://kolibrios.org/en/

[PicoMan]

not sure why i need this and what to start with it...

[mothered]

8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb

Back In my days of running the good old 16-Bit "Windows 3.1", only 2MB of Ram was required.

I'll check your link after this post.

[Pringle]

8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb

Back In my days of running the good old 16-Bit "Windows 3.1", only 2MB of Ram was required.

I'll check your link after this post.

that frightens me

[darkninja1980]

There's an os that takes up 1.44mb of space and requires 8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb. I don't know if you've heard of it, but I don't believe this at all. I really want to setup dualboot with this now...
Link for anyone else who wants it:http://kolibrios.org/en/

I am not very impressed with this OS system. it does remind me of old school windows 98 and lower.

[Pringle]

There's an os that takes up 1.44mb of space and requires 8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb. I don't know if you've heard of it, but I don't believe this at all. I really want to setup dualboot with this now...
Link for anyone else who wants it:http://kolibrios.org/en/

I am not very impressed with this OS system. it does remind me of old school windows 98 and lower.

smh... disappointing tastes

[darkninja1980]

There's an os that takes up 1.44mb of space and requires 8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb. I don't know if you've heard of it, but I don't believe this at all. I really want to setup dualboot with this now...
Link for anyone else who wants it:http://kolibrios.org/en/

I am not very impressed with this OS system. it does remind me of old school windows 98 and lower.

smh... disappointing tastes

very true.

[mothered]

8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb

Back In my days of running the good old 16-Bit "Windows 3.1", only 2MB of Ram was required.

I'll check your link after this post.

that frightens me

It was actually a pleasant experience at the time.

I still have the OS In a bootable ISO file. What capacity do you think Windows 3.1 Is?

[darkninja1980]

Back In my days of running the good old 16-Bit "Windows 3.1", only 2MB of Ram was required.

I'll check your link after this post.

that frightens me

It was actually a pleasant experience at the time.

I still have the OS In a bootable ISO file. What capacity do you think Windows 3.1 Is?

100% IBM compatible computer.
80386 or higher processor aka a “386” system.
2MB or better RAM.
8MB Hard disk drive space.
3.5 inch or 5.25 inch floppy disc drive.
VGA video.
Keyboard and Mouse.
DOS 3.1 or higher.

[mothered]

that frightens me

It was actually a pleasant experience at the time.

I still have the OS In a bootable ISO file. What capacity do you think Windows 3.1 Is?

   100% IBM compatible computer.
   80386 or higher processor aka a “386” system.
   2MB or better RAM.
   8MB Hard disk drive space.
   3.5 inch or 5.25 inch floppy disc drive.
   VGA video.
   Keyboard and Mouse.
   DOS 3.1 or higher.

No.

You've Googled the "system requirements",  which Is not what I asked.
My question Is:

What capacity do you think Windows 3.1 Is?