[Cyb3rNuX]

Tag Efficiency Tester is software that helps you find the most popular tags based on their search popularity on the Bing search engine.

Features

Tag Efficiency Tester supports multithreading, which allows it to test multiple tags at the same time – instead of checking them one by one. This can shorten the waiting time a lot by getting the 20-minute work done in less than 60 seconds. Multithreading can be described as having multiple “bots” work at the same time. The more you have – the faster the software will work. It will also affect your CPU and RAM, so set the thread count wisely.

Besides, it also gives you an option to sort out your results by popularity. After clicking on the sort results arrow, you can sort the results by having the most popular tags near the top and the least near the bottom of the table.

In case you don’t want your results to have commas in their numbers, simply tick the remove comma in results checkbox. Numbers that look like “10,000″ will look like “10000”.

Download

Free download: Tag Efficiency Tester v1.0

File size: 113 KB
Version: 1.0

VirusTotal scan: here

[mothered]

Nice one.

Do you plan on Implementing other search engines with future releases?

[Cyb3rNuX]

Nice one.

Do you plan on Implementing other search engines with future releases?

Thank you! At the moment, I don't plan on implementing other search engines. Maybe I'll simply find a better method to test hashtag efficiency.

The reason is that Bing allows a lot of search requests in a short period of time without getting your IP blocked. Therefore, it doesn't need proxies to work with (unlike Google, most likely).

[mothered]

Thank you! At the moment, I don't plan on implementing other search engines. Maybe I'll simply find a better method to test hashtag efficiency.

The reason is that Bing allows a lot of search requests in a short period of time without getting your IP blocked. Therefore, it doesn't need proxies to work with (unlike Google, most likely).

No problem at all with the search engines, just thought I'd ask.

Thanks again for another fine contribution.