Login Register
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


Freenet Anonymous Browser filter_list
Author
Message
Freenet Anonymous Browser #1
Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil
you can get it here : https://freenetproject.org/
Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil  Evil

What is Freenet?

Freenet is a platform for censorship-resistant communication and publishing. It is designed to ensure true freedom of communication over the Internet. It allows anybody to publish and read information with complete anonymity. Nobody controls Freenet, not even its creators, meaning that the system is not vulnerable to manipulation or shutdown. Freenet is also very efficient in how it deals with information, adaptively replicating content in response to demand. For more information, see What is Freenet?

How is Freenet different to Tor? Can I access Google/Facebook/etc through Freenet?

Freenet is a self-contained network, while Tor allows accessing the web anonymously, as well as using "hidden services" (anonymous web servers). Freenet is not a proxy: You cannot connect to services like Google or Facebook using Freenet. However, Freenet has websites, filesharing, forums, chat, microblogging, email etc, all anonymous and hosted within Freenet.

Freenet is a distributed datastore, so once content is uploaded to Freenet, it will remain on Freenet forever, as long as it remains popular, without fear of censorship or denial of service attacks, and without needing to run your own web server and keep it online constantly.

The other big difference is that Freenet has the "darknet" or Friend to Friend mode, where your Freenet node (software on your computer) only connects to the Freenet nodes run by your friends, i.e. people you know (and maybe to their friends, to speed things up). This makes blocking Freenet, e.g. on a national firewall, extremely difficult.

However, most people currently use Freenet in "opennet" mode (that is, connecting automatically to whoever the network assigns, rather than connecting only to their friends). This is much less secure than using Freenet in "darknet" mode, and is relatively easy to block, as it does have some central servers ("seed nodes").

Freenet has many unsolved problems, and is still experimental. Our objective for Freenet is to build a global friend-to-friend darknet, which would be extremely difficult to block, and would provide very strong anonymity and censorship resistance. This will require further work on Freenet, on usability, speed and security, but above all it is a techno-social experiment: Will people know enough friends who are willing to use Freenet to make such an anonymous friend-to-friend network possible? This is why Freenet supports "opennet" mode: to let people try it out before they ask their friends to connect.

Tor is a little less experimental, and arguably is an easier problem; it may provide better anonymity today, provided that it isn't blocked, and of course, Tor lets you access the internet as a whole, whereas on Freenet you can only access Freenet content. However if you can use a large enough darknet, Freenet already provides an interesting level of censorship resistance, DoS resistance and anonymity.

Using the internet "anonymously" is not necessarily easy: Connecting to Facebook through Tor doesn't prevent Facebook from knowing pretty much everything about you, and connecting to your (non-HTTPS) webmail account through Tor may mean the person running the proxy ("exit node") can steal your webmail account password.

Freenet is a separate network, which does things differently, because there are no central servers. This is why we don't support Javascript, server-side scripting etc on freesites: Everything must be rewritten to work on a distributed network. But the advantage is there is no single server which can be compelled to hand over your private communications or which can be shut down.

There are still risks, for example, talking about your home town or internet provider on an anonymous forum, or downloading files which Freenet can't make safe such as PDFs or word processor documents (Freenet will warn you about this). Also, for web content in particular, it may be easier to upload it to Freenet than set up a hidden server on Tor; you don't need to keep your node online for your content to be available, you don't need to figure out how to configure it safely, and most important, if you go away your site will still be available.
Cool
source : https://freenetproject.org/pages/help.html
Cool

This Post is for educational purposes only. I am not responsible for any illegal/damage causing behavior.
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2017, 02:04 PM by R3set. Edit Reason: add : This Post is for educational purposes only. I am not responsible for any illegal/damage causing behavior )

Reply

RE: Freenet Anonymous Browser #2
As with everything, there are pros and cons.

I'm just reading the documentation on It's website (which Is quite detailed), and I shall decide on It's usage thereafter.
Thanks for this, appreciated.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: Freenet Anonymous Browser #3
There is a lot of CP on Freenet...and I mean a LOT, and its too easy to find, but hard to access on accident.

Also, I wouldn't recommend using Freenet for public internet anonymity. Here is a speed comparison.
Downloading Time for 100Mb on Tor = Webpage Loadtime on Freenet
Freenet takes ages to load...just saying.

Also, Freenet has a new website, so thats cool. But is it a browser? Last time I used it, you would load an 8888 port on your localhost to load the Freenet client.
You can find me on Keybase
"Reach the state of ubiquity, and you will be in control"
Student, Technician, Designer, and more.
[Image: YUpAMpx.png]

Reply







Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)