[SxTxN]

[mothered]

This Is actually very Interesting.

I've watched the first 5 minutes or so, and surprised that the building was analyzed 53 years ago and In the event a 707 collided, was deemed safe. I shall watch the rest when I log off here.
Much appreciated.

[Blink]

I want to watch this, but the background noises and the ladies voice are creepy. I'll watch it tomorrow.

[Skullmeat]

I need to find it, but I recall finding a book/article where a structural engieer debunked every one of the 9/11 conspriacy theories point for point.

[Skullmeat]

Here we go: http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/amp49/1227842/

"Jet fuel cant melt steel beams."

No, but it can weaken them. Ever seen a hot piece of metal? Before it melts, it becomes soft and mallable. The beams supporting the WTC likely bent, and concrete, while having excellent compressive strength, has very little tensile strength. Thats why rebar is used in buildings. Without support the concrete simply buckled and broke apart. Domino effect from the floors crashing on top each other took hold, and the buildings came down.

[Bish0pQ]

I have seen many videos/articles like this. If I remember correctly, the FBI released new photos of the incident in march this year (http://gg.gg/58m1l)

I do agree that it doesn't melt. It's easy to find melting temperatures online, though that isn't the only factor we should look at.
It also depends how much weight is on the beams etc...

I think the only way to find the truth is to go back in time and investigate everything before it happens, but since that isn't possible (yet). If there is hard proof it's being debunked by the government (if they did it) anyway. For now everything are just theories in my opinion.